Comparative Analysis of CNNs and Transformers for Binary Classification of Breast Cancer Mammograms

This paper focuses on a binary classification task for mammography breast cancer detection, aiming to distinguish between cancer-positive and cancer-negative cases. Our work involves exploring various existing models in deep learning such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models and Transformer models that can cater to better detection of breast cancer. Comparisons among these models are obtained concerning their performance using evaluation metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score. VGG-19 and CaiT models proved to perform better with 0.6893 and 0.6085 F1-scores, respectively. Additionally, we dealt with the challenges encountered in the breast cancer detection dataset considered for the task. By examining these methods and their results, our objective is to offer perspectives on enhancing the effectiveness and precision of breast cancer detection techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/rait65068.2025.11089463
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of CNNs and Transformers for Binary Classification of Breast Cancer Mammograms

Srilatha Chebrolu, V. K. Hanuman Turaga, Laya Rangu, Sushma Onapakala et al.
1 links
AI in cancer detection
article

Comparative Analysis of CNNs and Transformers for Binary Classification of Breast Cancer Mammograms

Srilatha Chebrolu, V. K. Hanuman Turaga, Laya Rangu, Sushma Onapakala, Prasanna Dubba
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on a binary classification task for mammography breast cancer detection, aiming to distinguish between cancer-positive and cancer-negative cases. Our work involves exploring various existing models in deep learning such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models and Transformer models that can cater to better detection of breast cancer. Comparisons among these models are obtained concerning their performance using evaluation metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score. VGG-19 and CaiT models proved to perform better with 0.6893 and 0.6085 F1-scores, respectively. Additionally, we dealt with the challenges encountered in the breast cancer detection dataset considered for the task. By examining these methods and their results, our objective is to offer perspectives on enhancing the effectiveness and precision of breast cancer detection techniques.

National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.