Comparison between PMV and modified PMV indices in the context of thermal comfort assessment and predicted productivity loss

Even though Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) index is widely used for thermal comfort assessment and it is implemented within the international standards, available literature suggest that there are limitations of its application. These limitations lead to the introduction of modified PMV indices such as the extended Predicted Mean Vote (ePMV) and the adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV), which can, under specific conditions, improve the accuracy of the original PMV. Taking that into consideration, this study aims at analyzing the differences between PMV and its modifications aPMV and ePMV, calculated for different sets of input parameters, while discussing the values of the productivity loss predicted based on them as well, which is the main novelty of this research. In accordance with appropriately defined dataset, the results are presented for PMV values higher than 0, and they suggest that for the input parameters coinciding with PMV values close to thermal neutrality, the differences between PMV and its modifications, as well as those between predicted productivity loss calculated based on them, are negligible from the thermal comfort standpoint. On the other hand, these differences can significantly increase for inputs which coincide with higher PMV values. This increase is heavily dependent on the adopted adaptive coefficient and expectancy factor values, and it can result with different occupants’ thermal sensation prediction. Furthermore, the difference between predicted productivity calculated based on the PMV and ePMV can reach over 20%, reaching over 15% in the case of comparison between PMV and aPMV. This implies that while predicting thermal comfort and, further, productivity loss by using these indices can be beneficial, it is crucial to appropriately select expectancy factor and adaptive coefficient values, especially if the original PMV predicts higher occupants’ thermal sensation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/splitech65624.2025.11091802
Primary Topic
Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between PMV and modified PMV indices in the context of thermal comfort assessment and predicted productivity loss

Anton Kerčov, Maja Todorović, Tamara Bajc
Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
article

Comparison between PMV and modified PMV indices in the context of thermal comfort assessment and predicted productivity loss

Anton Kerčov, Maja Todorović, Tamara Bajc
article en

Abstract

Even though Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) index is widely used for thermal comfort assessment and it is implemented within the international standards, available literature suggest that there are limitations of its application. These limitations lead to the introduction of modified PMV indices such as the extended Predicted Mean Vote (ePMV) and the adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV), which can, under specific conditions, improve the accuracy of the original PMV. Taking that into consideration, this study aims at analyzing the differences between PMV and its modifications aPMV and ePMV, calculated for different sets of input parameters, while discussing the values of the productivity loss predicted based on them as well, which is the main novelty of this research. In accordance with appropriately defined dataset, the results are presented for PMV values higher than 0, and they suggest that for the input parameters coinciding with PMV values close to thermal neutrality, the differences between PMV and its modifications, as well as those between predicted productivity loss calculated based on them, are negligible from the thermal comfort standpoint. On the other hand, these differences can significantly increase for inputs which coincide with higher PMV values. This increase is heavily dependent on the adopted adaptive coefficient and expectancy factor values, and it can result with different occupants’ thermal sensation prediction. Furthermore, the difference between predicted productivity calculated based on the PMV and ePMV can reach over 20%, reaching over 15% in the case of comparison between PMV and aPMV. This implies that while predicting thermal comfort and, further, productivity loss by using these indices can be beneficial, it is crucial to appropriately select expectancy factor and adaptive coefficient values, especially if the original PMV predicts higher occupants’ thermal sensation.

University of Belgrade (RS)
Ministry of Education
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.