Theoretical Contradictions in Belt and Road Initiative

This research analyzes the theoretical foundations of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with a specific focus on the ASEAN region. The efforts to revamp the BRI and enhance its long-term viability indicate the importance of BRI not only in the Chinese diplomatic strategy but also in its ideological discourse for Global Governance. This paper examines the theoretical basis for the modernization projects of the BRI by comparing them with the Western models. By critically examining the theoretical presuppositions that equate modernization with the Western governance model, this paper argues how the reformed multilateral strategies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) achieve its global governance goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.51657
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical Contradictions in Belt and Road Initiative

Alka Singh
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Theoretical Contradictions in Belt and Road Initiative

Alka Singh
article en

Abstract

This research analyzes the theoretical foundations of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with a specific focus on the ASEAN region. The efforts to revamp the BRI and enhance its long-term viability indicate the importance of BRI not only in the Chinese diplomatic strategy but also in its ideological discourse for Global Governance. This paper examines the theoretical basis for the modernization projects of the BRI by comparing them with the Western models. By critically examining the theoretical presuppositions that equate modernization with the Western governance model, this paper argues how the reformed multilateral strategies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) achieve its global governance goals.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.