Radical Suffering, Callousness, and Child Abuse: Communal Responsibilities for Suffering and Advocacy within Cultures Abuse

The definition of suffering is difficult to pinpoint, particularly when addressing suffering within cases of child abuse. Dividing humanity into the categories of “perpetrators” and “victims” is too rudimentary. This dichotomy depreciates the human cost of the “perpetrator” while simultaneously failing to account for the complexity of “victimization” and the communal/collective responsibility for the suffering of those abused. This essay introduces two terms from feminist Christian theology, “radical suffering” and “callousness,” as a way of bolstering already-established definitions of suffering within the clinical context and bioethics literature. The aim is to: a) describe suffering in a way that mitigates dehumanizing tendencies and b) direct attention to a collective responsibility for cultures of abuse that enable violence and violation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7202/1118913ar
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radical Suffering, Callousness, and Child Abuse: Communal Responsibilities for Suffering and Advocacy within Cultures Abuse

R. Dawn Hood-Patterson
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Radical Suffering, Callousness, and Child Abuse: Communal Responsibilities for Suffering and Advocacy within Cultures Abuse

R. Dawn Hood-Patterson
article en

Abstract

The definition of suffering is difficult to pinpoint, particularly when addressing suffering within cases of child abuse. Dividing humanity into the categories of “perpetrators” and “victims” is too rudimentary. This dichotomy depreciates the human cost of the “perpetrator” while simultaneously failing to account for the complexity of “victimization” and the communal/collective responsibility for the suffering of those abused. This essay introduces two terms from feminist Christian theology, “radical suffering” and “callousness,” as a way of bolstering already-established definitions of suffering within the clinical context and bioethics literature. The aim is to: a) describe suffering in a way that mitigates dehumanizing tendencies and b) direct attention to a collective responsibility for cultures of abuse that enable violence and violation.

Canadian Journal of BioethicsVol. 8(3)
Cook Children's Health Care System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.