Nicaea, Constantine, and Gender

Abstract The canons of the Council of Nicaea appear to confirm what some might consider today to be stereotypical views of gender identity. However, according to Philostorgius, a Christian church historian of Late Antiquity, Constantine's stepsister Constantia played an influential role in the decisions of some sceptical key players to sign the creed. Some non‐Christian sources on Constantine's religious policy at the time of Nicaea ascribe an even greater role to women. They explain the emperor's conversion as an effect of the influence of the imperial court, in which, according to them, women played a key role. These sources even see the conversion of the emperor resulting in what they consider to be a “feminization” of the Roman Empire. This article briefly presents Constantia as a key female actor of imperial religious politics according to Philostorgius and looks at the non‐Christian polemical accusation of “feminization” against Christianity in the age of Constantine. The concluding section examines the Roman Empire's reception of feminization in two historical interpretations of Constantine which are still influential in Western European discourses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Mission
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irom.12528
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nicaea, Constantine, and Gender

Martin Illert
International Review of Mission
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Nicaea, Constantine, and Gender

Martin Illert
article en

Abstract

Abstract The canons of the Council of Nicaea appear to confirm what some might consider today to be stereotypical views of gender identity. However, according to Philostorgius, a Christian church historian of Late Antiquity, Constantine's stepsister Constantia played an influential role in the decisions of some sceptical key players to sign the creed. Some non‐Christian sources on Constantine's religious policy at the time of Nicaea ascribe an even greater role to women. They explain the emperor's conversion as an effect of the influence of the imperial court, in which, according to them, women played a key role. These sources even see the conversion of the emperor resulting in what they consider to be a “feminization” of the Roman Empire. This article briefly presents Constantia as a key female actor of imperial religious politics according to Philostorgius and looks at the non‐Christian polemical accusation of “feminization” against Christianity in the age of Constantine. The concluding section examines the Roman Empire's reception of feminization in two historical interpretations of Constantine which are still influential in Western European discourses.

International Review of MissionVol. 114(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nicaea, Constantine, and Gender — Martin Illert · International Review of Mission (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS