Reclaiming Sophia

Abstract The First Council of Nicaea (325 CE) was convened primarily to address the Christological dispute concerning the nature of Jesus: his origin, divinity, and relationship to God the Father. The controversy, which arose within the Christian clergy of Alexandria, particularly between Arius and his opponents, formed the central agenda of the council. The resulting Nicene Creed affirmed Jesus as “begotten, not made, of one being with the Father” (homoousios), establishing a unified doctrinal position within the church. However, while women had held notable roles in the early church, they were not intentionally involved in the deliberations. The council's decisions not only established doctrinal norms but also dictated the parameters of influence, leadership, and historical recognition. Thus, the council represents a missed opportunity. By not recognizing the importance of women in its critical deliberations, the council laid the groundwork for systemic patterns of exclusion that would persist for centuries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Mission
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irom.12526
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reclaiming Sophia

Charity Tozivepi‐Nzegwu
International Review of Mission
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Reclaiming Sophia

Charity Tozivepi‐Nzegwu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The First Council of Nicaea (325 CE) was convened primarily to address the Christological dispute concerning the nature of Jesus: his origin, divinity, and relationship to God the Father. The controversy, which arose within the Christian clergy of Alexandria, particularly between Arius and his opponents, formed the central agenda of the council. The resulting Nicene Creed affirmed Jesus as “begotten, not made, of one being with the Father” (homoousios), establishing a unified doctrinal position within the church. However, while women had held notable roles in the early church, they were not intentionally involved in the deliberations. The council's decisions not only established doctrinal norms but also dictated the parameters of influence, leadership, and historical recognition. Thus, the council represents a missed opportunity. By not recognizing the importance of women in its critical deliberations, the council laid the groundwork for systemic patterns of exclusion that would persist for centuries.

International Review of MissionVol. 114(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.