LAW ENFORCEMENT ON CONFISCATION OF CORPORATE ASSETS AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER STATE FINANCES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

Asset forfeiture in corruption is an important legal enforcement instrument that aims not only to punish perpetrators but also to recover state financial losses. Perpetrators of corruption crimes are not only individuals but also corporations, both legal and non-legal entities. The research problems in this study are: how the regulation of corporate asset forfeiture as an effort to recover state financial losses in corruption crimes is formulated and how the enforcement of corporate asset forfeiture is carried out as a means of recovering state financial losses in corruption crimes. The theories employed in this study include law enforcement theory and asset forfeiture theory. This research applies a normative juridical method with an approach based on legislation, legal doctrines and relevant case studies. The results show that corporate asset forfeiture is a strategic measure which has to be a priority in the law enforcement agenda against corruption. Although Indonesia already has several legal instruments governing asset forfeiture, in reality, the implementation is still hindered by various challenges, such as regulatory, institutional and inter-agency coordination. Law enforcement often emphasizes the ultimum remedy approach, resulting in criminal sanctions against corporations to be overlooked and replaced by administrative sanctions. In fact, criminal prosecution of corporations is not only important as the state's measure to penalize crime, but also serves to restore state financial losses through seizure and confusion of illegal profits. This study recommends strengthening regulations through the enactment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, enhancing the capability of law enforcement officers in understanding the concept of corporate crime and establishing a special agency to handle asset forfeiture professionally and transparently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dharmawangsa International Journal of the Social Sciences Education and Humanitis
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46576/ijsseh.v6i2.7339
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LAW ENFORCEMENT ON CONFISCATION OF CORPORATE ASSETS AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER STATE FINANCES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Agnasia Marliana Tubalawony
Dharmawangsa International Journal of the Social Sciences Education and Humanitis
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

LAW ENFORCEMENT ON CONFISCATION OF CORPORATE ASSETS AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER STATE FINANCES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Agnasia Marliana Tubalawony
article en

Abstract

Asset forfeiture in corruption is an important legal enforcement instrument that aims not only to punish perpetrators but also to recover state financial losses. Perpetrators of corruption crimes are not only individuals but also corporations, both legal and non-legal entities. The research problems in this study are: how the regulation of corporate asset forfeiture as an effort to recover state financial losses in corruption crimes is formulated and how the enforcement of corporate asset forfeiture is carried out as a means of recovering state financial losses in corruption crimes. The theories employed in this study include law enforcement theory and asset forfeiture theory. This research applies a normative juridical method with an approach based on legislation, legal doctrines and relevant case studies. The results show that corporate asset forfeiture is a strategic measure which has to be a priority in the law enforcement agenda against corruption. Although Indonesia already has several legal instruments governing asset forfeiture, in reality, the implementation is still hindered by various challenges, such as regulatory, institutional and inter-agency coordination. Law enforcement often emphasizes the ultimum remedy approach, resulting in criminal sanctions against corporations to be overlooked and replaced by administrative sanctions. In fact, criminal prosecution of corporations is not only important as the state's measure to penalize crime, but also serves to restore state financial losses through seizure and confusion of illegal profits. This study recommends strengthening regulations through the enactment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, enhancing the capability of law enforcement officers in understanding the concept of corporate crime and establishing a special agency to handle asset forfeiture professionally and transparently.

Dharmawangsa International Journal of the Social Sciences Education and HumanitisVol. 6(2)
Universitas Jayabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LAW ENFORCEMENT ON CONFISCATION OF CORPORATE ASSETS AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER STATE FINANCES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION — Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, et al. · Dharmawangsa International Journal of the Social Sciences Education and Humanitis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS