Exploring Students’ Perspectives on Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools through Sequential Explanatory Mixed Method Study

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) writing tools in academic settings has transformed students' writing processes, yet concerns regarding effectiveness, ethical implications, and academic integrity persist. This study explores students' perspectives on the utilization of AI writing tools through a sequential explanatory mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase, conducted through a survey of 326 students, examined attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding AI tool usage, while the qualitative phase provided in-depth insights through semi-structured interviews. Results indicate that students generally perceive AI tools as effective in improving writing efficiency and organization. However, concerns about over-reliance, ethical challenges, and institutional inconsistencies in AI policies emerged as critical issues. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in students' perceptions based on sex, academic year level, and frequency of AI tool usage. The study emphasizes the need for institutional guidelines, AI literacy programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible AI integration in higher education. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and academic institutions in formulating strategies that balance AI benefits with academic integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.104.37
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Students’ Perspectives on Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools through Sequential Explanatory Mixed Method Study

Vlademir T. Turingan
1 citations
International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences
Educational Systems and Policies
3.25
article

Exploring Students’ Perspectives on Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools through Sequential Explanatory Mixed Method Study

Vlademir T. Turingan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) writing tools in academic settings has transformed students' writing processes, yet concerns regarding effectiveness, ethical implications, and academic integrity persist. This study explores students' perspectives on the utilization of AI writing tools through a sequential explanatory mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase, conducted through a survey of 326 students, examined attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding AI tool usage, while the qualitative phase provided in-depth insights through semi-structured interviews. Results indicate that students generally perceive AI tools as effective in improving writing efficiency and organization. However, concerns about over-reliance, ethical challenges, and institutional inconsistencies in AI policies emerged as critical issues. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in students' perceptions based on sex, academic year level, and frequency of AI tool usage. The study emphasizes the need for institutional guidelines, AI literacy programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible AI integration in higher education. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and academic institutions in formulating strategies that balance AI benefits with academic integrity.

International Journal of English Literature and Social SciencesVol. 10(4)
Tarlac State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Systems and Policies
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.