An Analysis of High School Chinese Curriculum and Educational Directions : A Comparative Study of the 2015 Revised Chinese I and the 2022 Revised Chinese

This study analyzes and compares the high school Chinese curricula outlined in the 2015 Revised Chinese I and the 2022 Revised Chinese, to enhance understanding of the recent revisions and support their practical application in teaching and learning. Key differences between the two curricula are examined, including the introduction of a credit-based system—where one credit equals 16 sessions of 50 minutes—and a shift from a year-based to a semester-based structure, which is designed to strengthen continuity in learning.<br/> As in the 2015 Revised Curriculum, the 2022 curriculum requires schools to offer at least two second foreign language courses to ensure diverse student choices. Additional updates include explanatory notes appended to achievement standards for greater clarity and relevance, an expansion of core communicative expressions from 148 to 178 sentences, and the integration of new themes such as digital transformation and environmental change.<br/> Based on these findings, the study proposes teaching and learning strategies aligned with the revised curriculum. These include the development of quality-focused instructional methods, the use of digital media for personalized education, and the reinforcement of cultural education through an intercultural lens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25021/jcll.2025.6.152.215
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of High School Chinese Curriculum and Educational Directions : A Comparative Study of the 2015 Revised Chinese I and the 2022 Revised Chinese

Na-hyun Park, Hyeong-gyu Seo
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Educational Systems and Policies
article

An Analysis of High School Chinese Curriculum and Educational Directions : A Comparative Study of the 2015 Revised Chinese I and the 2022 Revised Chinese

Na-hyun Park, Hyeong-gyu Seo
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes and compares the high school Chinese curricula outlined in the 2015 Revised Chinese I and the 2022 Revised Chinese, to enhance understanding of the recent revisions and support their practical application in teaching and learning. Key differences between the two curricula are examined, including the introduction of a credit-based system—where one credit equals 16 sessions of 50 minutes—and a shift from a year-based to a semester-based structure, which is designed to strengthen continuity in learning.<br/> As in the 2015 Revised Curriculum, the 2022 curriculum requires schools to offer at least two second foreign language courses to ensure diverse student choices. Additional updates include explanatory notes appended to achievement standards for greater clarity and relevance, an expansion of core communicative expressions from 148 to 178 sentences, and the integration of new themes such as digital transformation and environmental change.<br/> Based on these findings, the study proposes teaching and learning strategies aligned with the revised curriculum. These include the development of quality-focused instructional methods, the use of digital media for personalized education, and the reinforcement of cultural education through an intercultural lens.

The Journal of Chinese Language and LiteratureVol. 152
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.