Integration of Social Robots in the Educational Environment: Psychological and Organizational Determinants of Effective Human–Robot Interaction in the University Context

Abstract: Social robotics is an innovative field that merges engineering, technological, and social disciplines with the aim of creating robots capable of engaging with humans in socially relevant ways (Breazeal, 2003; Fong et al., 2003). The growing interest in the application of social robots in education is driven by their ability to facilitate learning, support the development of social and emotional skills, and promote mental health and well-being among learners (Belpaeme et al., 2018; Kennedy et al., 2017). However, integrating social robots into the educational environment requires a thorough understanding of the psychological aspects of human–robot interaction, as well as the organizational factors that determine the success of their implementation (Vernon et al., 2015). In Bulgarian academic research, two main directions have emerged: Ivanova (2022) proposes a design model for educational social robots focusing on emotional expressiveness and cultural recognition; and STEMEDU (2022) demonstrates the positive impact of the BigFoot robot on children with special educational needs (SEN), including increased eye contact and social participation. Nonetheless, there remains an open opportunity to develop a comprehensive organizational model for the sustainable implementation of social robots in the university context. Over the past decade, social robots such as NAO, Pepper, and Furhat have been increasingly introduced in educational settings as teaching assistants, mediators of social skills, and tools for mental health support (Belpaeme et al., 2018; Scassellati et al., 2018). Yet, in higher education, their potential remains underexplored—particularly regarding organizational culture, innovation acceptance, and the psychological factors influencing the perception and effectiveness of such technologies (Van Achte et al., 2023; Kennedy et al., 2017). This study seeks to answer the following core question: What are the conditions and prerequisites for the sustainable and effective integration of social robots in university-level education?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56293/ijmsssr.2025.5715
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of Social Robots in the Educational Environment: Psychological and Organizational Determinants of Effective Human–Robot Interaction in the University Context

Paulina Tsvetkova, Mayiana Mitevska, Viktoria Angelova
International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research
Engineering Education and Technology
article

Integration of Social Robots in the Educational Environment: Psychological and Organizational Determinants of Effective Human–Robot Interaction in the University Context

Paulina Tsvetkova, Mayiana Mitevska, Viktoria Angelova
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Social robotics is an innovative field that merges engineering, technological, and social disciplines with the aim of creating robots capable of engaging with humans in socially relevant ways (Breazeal, 2003; Fong et al., 2003). The growing interest in the application of social robots in education is driven by their ability to facilitate learning, support the development of social and emotional skills, and promote mental health and well-being among learners (Belpaeme et al., 2018; Kennedy et al., 2017). However, integrating social robots into the educational environment requires a thorough understanding of the psychological aspects of human–robot interaction, as well as the organizational factors that determine the success of their implementation (Vernon et al., 2015). In Bulgarian academic research, two main directions have emerged: Ivanova (2022) proposes a design model for educational social robots focusing on emotional expressiveness and cultural recognition; and STEMEDU (2022) demonstrates the positive impact of the BigFoot robot on children with special educational needs (SEN), including increased eye contact and social participation. Nonetheless, there remains an open opportunity to develop a comprehensive organizational model for the sustainable implementation of social robots in the university context. Over the past decade, social robots such as NAO, Pepper, and Furhat have been increasingly introduced in educational settings as teaching assistants, mediators of social skills, and tools for mental health support (Belpaeme et al., 2018; Scassellati et al., 2018). Yet, in higher education, their potential remains underexplored—particularly regarding organizational culture, innovation acceptance, and the psychological factors influencing the perception and effectiveness of such technologies (Van Achte et al., 2023; Kennedy et al., 2017). This study seeks to answer the following core question: What are the conditions and prerequisites for the sustainable and effective integration of social robots in university-level education?

International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science ResearchVol. 07(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Engineering Education and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.