Risk Factors for Methicillin‐Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Carriers in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single‐Center, Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan

<b>Background:</b> Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is a common pathogen in the intensive care unit (ICU). Active surveillance cultures (ASCs) for MRSA are often performed in ICUs; however, they may not be optimal in ICUs with a low MRSA prevalence. This study aims to determine the risk factors of MRSA carriage in the ICU and develop a clinical predictive model to optimize the screening process. <b>Methods:</b> All patients who were admitted to the ICU between April 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. At the time of ICU admission, all patients underwent MRSA screening using nasal ASCs. Based on the screening results, patients were categorized into MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative groups. Patients' characteristics were evaluated to determine the prevalence of MRSA and the risk factors. Cost analysis was conducted based on the risk factors identified by our analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of the 3927 ICU patients included, 133 (3.4%) were MRSA-positive. Multivariate analyses showed that risk factors for MRSA carriage were age ≥ 50 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.11), history of hospitalization within a year (OR: 1.50), and ICD-10 codes classification I, IV, and XII (OR: 4.98). Screening patients based on at least one of the risk factors exhibited high sensitivity (96.9%) to identifying MRSA carriage and could reduce ASC overall costs by 10.9%, equivalent to $4686. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study suggests that universal ASCs to detect MRSA may not be optimal in ICU settings with a low prevalence of MRSA. Targeted screening based on risk factors may reduce the volume and cost of MRSA screening. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and to assess the generalizability of the proposed screening strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/5747507
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors for Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single‐Center, Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan

Ippei Sakamaki, Shinpei Matsuda, Hisato Yoshida, Hitoshi Yoshimura et al.
1 links
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Risk Factors for Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single‐Center, Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan

Ippei Sakamaki, Shinpei Matsuda, Hisato Yoshida, Hitoshi Yoshimura, Hitoshi Tsukamoto, Koji Hosokawa, Kyoko Hisada, Masayuki Nigo, Hiromichi Iwasaki, Takahiro Tokunaga
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is a common pathogen in the intensive care unit (ICU). Active surveillance cultures (ASCs) for MRSA are often performed in ICUs; however, they may not be optimal in ICUs with a low MRSA prevalence. This study aims to determine the risk factors of MRSA carriage in the ICU and develop a clinical predictive model to optimize the screening process. <b>Methods:</b> All patients who were admitted to the ICU between April 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. At the time of ICU admission, all patients underwent MRSA screening using nasal ASCs. Based on the screening results, patients were categorized into MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative groups. Patients' characteristics were evaluated to determine the prevalence of MRSA and the risk factors. Cost analysis was conducted based on the risk factors identified by our analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of the 3927 ICU patients included, 133 (3.4%) were MRSA-positive. Multivariate analyses showed that risk factors for MRSA carriage were age ≥ 50 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.11), history of hospitalization within a year (OR: 1.50), and ICD-10 codes classification I, IV, and XII (OR: 4.98). Screening patients based on at least one of the risk factors exhibited high sensitivity (96.9%) to identifying MRSA carriage and could reduce ASC overall costs by 10.9%, equivalent to $4686. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study suggests that universal ASCs to detect MRSA may not be optimal in ICU settings with a low prevalence of MRSA. Targeted screening based on risk factors may reduce the volume and cost of MRSA screening. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and to assess the generalizability of the proposed screening strategy.

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologyVol. 2025(1)
University of Fukui (JP), University of Fukui Hospital (JP), Methodist Hospital (US), Toyama University Hospital (JP), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.