In-house designed simulation courses versus society-accredited designs by international societies: A comparative analysis
Both in-house and society-accredited SBME courses exhibit distinct strengths. Adopting best practices from both models, may guide a hybrid approach that optimizes SBME outcomes. However, reliance on self-reported data and a lack of controls for instructor competence or teaching style limit generalizability. Future research should include a broader sample, more rigorous content analysis, longitudinal follow-up, and detailed participant experience data to enhance the depth and applicability of findings.
Authors
- Igor Abramovich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-6223)
- Joana Berger‐Estilita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-4264)
- Torsten Schröder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4897-1481)
- Jakob Beilstein
- Eva Kornemann
Institutions
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Hirslanden Salem-Spital (CH)
- Berliner Energieagentur (Germany) (DE)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001756
- Primary Topic
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00