Effects of Measurement Distance on Accuracy in Optical Impression with Intraoral Scanners

Recently, several reports have described that the accuracy of intraoral scanners is equal to or greater than that of conventional methods using silicone rubber impressions. However, it is unclear whether intraoral scanners are applicable to patients with more than three missing teeth or edentulous jaws. A computer numerical control coordinate-measuring machine was employed to measure the reference models as a control. Subsequently, two types of intraoral scanners, TRIOS3 (TR3) and PrimeScan (PS), were examined to estimate the trueness and precision of the distance using image analysis software. In this study, the accuracy of the new high-end model of the intraoral scanner and the popular model were examined to verify their range of application to oral implant treatment. Regarding the error in trueness, no significant differences were observed between the scanners when short distances were measured, whereas the error in TR3 was significantly larger when a long distance was measured. No significant difference in precision error was observed between the two scanners, even when long-distance scanning was performed. When measured using TR3, the errors in both trueness and precision were significantly larger when long distances were scanned. In contrast, when using PS, the error in trueness was significantly larger when long distances were scanned; however, there was no significant difference in the error in precision between long- and short-distance scanning. The results of our study suggest that the errors tend to increase with an increase in the scanned distance. In addition, these results suggest that the accuracy was equivalent between the PS and TR, when the scanning distance was short. Optical impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner could be clinically applicable to implant treatment in the case of a small number of missing teeth. A newly provided high-performance scanner might be applicable to cases with a larger number of missing teeth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hard Tissue Biology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.34.123
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Measurement Distance on Accuracy in Optical Impression with Intraoral Scanners

Shota Fukazawa, Hisatomo Kondo, Kazuhiro Kon, Akiko Nagai et al.
Journal of Hard Tissue Biology
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
article

Effects of Measurement Distance on Accuracy in Optical Impression with Intraoral Scanners

Shota Fukazawa, Hisatomo Kondo, Kazuhiro Kon, Akiko Nagai, Kyoko Takafuji, Eri Daikoku
article en

Abstract

Recently, several reports have described that the accuracy of intraoral scanners is equal to or greater than that of conventional methods using silicone rubber impressions. However, it is unclear whether intraoral scanners are applicable to patients with more than three missing teeth or edentulous jaws. A computer numerical control coordinate-measuring machine was employed to measure the reference models as a control. Subsequently, two types of intraoral scanners, TRIOS3 (TR3) and PrimeScan (PS), were examined to estimate the trueness and precision of the distance using image analysis software. In this study, the accuracy of the new high-end model of the intraoral scanner and the popular model were examined to verify their range of application to oral implant treatment. Regarding the error in trueness, no significant differences were observed between the scanners when short distances were measured, whereas the error in TR3 was significantly larger when a long distance was measured. No significant difference in precision error was observed between the two scanners, even when long-distance scanning was performed. When measured using TR3, the errors in both trueness and precision were significantly larger when long distances were scanned. In contrast, when using PS, the error in trueness was significantly larger when long distances were scanned; however, there was no significant difference in the error in precision between long- and short-distance scanning. The results of our study suggest that the errors tend to increase with an increase in the scanned distance. In addition, these results suggest that the accuracy was equivalent between the PS and TR, when the scanning distance was short. Optical impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner could be clinically applicable to implant treatment in the case of a small number of missing teeth. A newly provided high-performance scanner might be applicable to cases with a larger number of missing teeth.

Journal of Hard Tissue BiologyVol. 34(3)
Aichi Gakuin University (JP), American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics (US)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.