Między prawem a polityką. O politycznym wpływie orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej na proces integracji europejskiej

The issue of the law-making role of courts has been a subject of research interest for a very long time. The academic debate on the Court of Justice of the European Union and the so-called activism of this institution has also been going on in this context for several decades. The article starts with the assumption that even if attributing a legislative role to the Court is too far-reaching, its case law is at least pro-integrationist, that is its judgments are in fact very politically significant. The main purpose of the article is therefore to answer the question of what political consequences have resulted and continue to result from the case law of the Court. In other words, the purpose is to show the political influence of this institution on the integration process within the European Union. The second problem – the research question that will be attempted to be answered – is the problem of how such pro-integrationist activity of the Court can be explained. The article is prepared on the basis of the literature on the subject and the case law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Sejmowy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2025.290
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Między prawem a polityką. O politycznym wpływie orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej na proces integracji europejskiej

Tomasz Kubin
Przegląd Sejmowy
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Między prawem a polityką. O politycznym wpływie orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej na proces integracji europejskiej

Tomasz Kubin
article en

Abstract

The issue of the law-making role of courts has been a subject of research interest for a very long time. The academic debate on the Court of Justice of the European Union and the so-called activism of this institution has also been going on in this context for several decades. The article starts with the assumption that even if attributing a legislative role to the Court is too far-reaching, its case law is at least pro-integrationist, that is its judgments are in fact very politically significant. The main purpose of the article is therefore to answer the question of what political consequences have resulted and continue to result from the case law of the Court. In other words, the purpose is to show the political influence of this institution on the integration process within the European Union. The second problem – the research question that will be attempted to be answered – is the problem of how such pro-integrationist activity of the Court can be explained. The article is prepared on the basis of the literature on the subject and the case law.

Przegląd SejmowyVol. 2(187)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Między prawem a polityką. O politycznym wpływie orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej na proces integracji europejskiej — Tomasz Kubin · Przegląd Sejmowy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS