Notatka na temat skutków prawnych Postanowienia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 3 października 2024 r., sygn. akt K 24/24

The memorandum is of a legal doctrinal research nature. It analyses the consequences of the Constitutional Tribunal’s provisional decision of 3 October 2024 for the activities of the inquiry committee. In this provisional decision, the Constitutional Tribunal ordered the committee to refrain from taking any action until the case before the Tribunal is determined. The memorandum discusses the legal defects of the provisional decision resulting from the fact that the composition of the Constitutional Tribunal’s adjudicating bench was unlawful, and it refers to the interpretation of Article 190(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The memorandum ends with the claim that there is no legal basis for issuing the provisional decision securing the application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Sejmowy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2025.297
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Notatka na temat skutków prawnych Postanowienia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 3 października 2024 r., sygn. akt K 24/24

Michał Ziółkowski
Przegląd Sejmowy
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Notatka na temat skutków prawnych Postanowienia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 3 października 2024 r., sygn. akt K 24/24

Michał Ziółkowski
article en

Abstract

The memorandum is of a legal doctrinal research nature. It analyses the consequences of the Constitutional Tribunal’s provisional decision of 3 October 2024 for the activities of the inquiry committee. In this provisional decision, the Constitutional Tribunal ordered the committee to refrain from taking any action until the case before the Tribunal is determined. The memorandum discusses the legal defects of the provisional decision resulting from the fact that the composition of the Constitutional Tribunal’s adjudicating bench was unlawful, and it refers to the interpretation of Article 190(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The memorandum ends with the claim that there is no legal basis for issuing the provisional decision securing the application.

Przegląd SejmowyVol. 2(187)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.