AI-Powered Parkinson’s Detection: A Deep Learning Breakthrough for Early Diagnosis

This study evaluates the performance of VGG19 and VGG16 deep learning models for diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD) using biomedical data. The objective was to assess their diagnostic accuracy and suitability for clinical applications. Both models were trained and tested on a dataset, with VGG19 achieving a test accuracy of 88.51% and an F1 score of 89.44%, while VGG16 recorded 86.49% accuracy and an F1 score of 87.95%. VGG19 slightly outperformed VGG16 in classifying PD-positive cases, with both models showing minimal overfitting and strong generalization on unseen data. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed balanced precision and recall, though potential class imbalances in the dataset require further investigation. These findings highlight the efficacy of VGG19 and VGG16 for early PD detection, emphasizing their potential to support timely interventions. Future improvements could include data augmentation, transfer learning, or threshold tuning to enhance diagnostic specificity. While promising, validation on diverse datasets is essential before clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicv64824.2025.11086015
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Parkinson’s Detection: A Deep Learning Breakthrough for Early Diagnosis

D. Singh, Ankur Singh Bist, Vaibhav Kumar Sharma
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

AI-Powered Parkinson’s Detection: A Deep Learning Breakthrough for Early Diagnosis

D. Singh, Ankur Singh Bist, Vaibhav Kumar Sharma
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of VGG19 and VGG16 deep learning models for diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD) using biomedical data. The objective was to assess their diagnostic accuracy and suitability for clinical applications. Both models were trained and tested on a dataset, with VGG19 achieving a test accuracy of 88.51% and an F1 score of 89.44%, while VGG16 recorded 86.49% accuracy and an F1 score of 87.95%. VGG19 slightly outperformed VGG16 in classifying PD-positive cases, with both models showing minimal overfitting and strong generalization on unseen data. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed balanced precision and recall, though potential class imbalances in the dataset require further investigation. These findings highlight the efficacy of VGG19 and VGG16 for early PD detection, emphasizing their potential to support timely interventions. Future improvements could include data augmentation, transfer learning, or threshold tuning to enhance diagnostic specificity. While promising, validation on diverse datasets is essential before clinical adoption.

Graphic Era University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.