Fair Summarization in the Age of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Fairness in summarization has been getting increasing attention recently. Achieving fairness through Large Language Models (LLMs) is particularly of special interest as LLMs are considered state-of-the-art models in various Natural Language Tasks, especially considering that LLM generated summaries are largely preferred by humans. As these automatic summarizers are used more extensively, they propagate and amplify biases present in source material.Few papers have explored the entirety of the landscape on the types of biases, notions of fairness, and strategies of mitigation. In this paper, we attempt to bridge this gap and provide a comprehensive overview of the problem of increasing fairness in text summarization and strategies to overcome it. Specifically, we present a brief introduction into why fairness in summarization is crucial from a societal standpoint. We also thoroughly explore the various possible definitions of fairness and how bias is manifested in LLMs trained on skewed data. Additionally, we provide an examination of the various mitigation techniques that have been used to enhance fairness and the challenges that continue to impede progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicv64824.2025.11086003
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Summarization in the Age of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Vivek Yadav, Vishal Das, S. K. Mittal, Kavinder Singh
Topic Modeling
article

Fair Summarization in the Age of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Vivek Yadav, Vishal Das, S. K. Mittal, Kavinder Singh
article en

Abstract

Fairness in summarization has been getting increasing attention recently. Achieving fairness through Large Language Models (LLMs) is particularly of special interest as LLMs are considered state-of-the-art models in various Natural Language Tasks, especially considering that LLM generated summaries are largely preferred by humans. As these automatic summarizers are used more extensively, they propagate and amplify biases present in source material.Few papers have explored the entirety of the landscape on the types of biases, notions of fairness, and strategies of mitigation. In this paper, we attempt to bridge this gap and provide a comprehensive overview of the problem of increasing fairness in text summarization and strategies to overcome it. Specifically, we present a brief introduction into why fairness in summarization is crucial from a societal standpoint. We also thoroughly explore the various possible definitions of fairness and how bias is manifested in LLMs trained on skewed data. Additionally, we provide an examination of the various mitigation techniques that have been used to enhance fairness and the challenges that continue to impede progress.

Delhi Technological University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fair Summarization in the Age of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey — Vivek Yadav, Vishal Das, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS