The Legality Trap: Legal Co-optation Under Authoritarianism

Abstract In democracies, legal advocacy is known to channel social movements into narrower, less radical paths. However, the extent and conditions under which law co-opts social movements in nondemocratic contexts remain less clear, particularly given the constraints of underdeveloped legal systems and the frequent blending of legal and nonlegal mobilization tactics among societal actors. This Article examines environmental legal mobilization in China as a case study, illustrating how a discriminatory legal opportunity structure—where the judiciary provides a powerful platform for advocacy, yet access and affordability are limited to those demonstrating state-aligned behaviors—serves as an effective mechanism of co-optation under authoritarianism. By permitting environmental NGOs to engage in public interest litigation while tightly regulating their legal standing and financial resources, the party-state has led NGOs to self-moderate their goals and tactics, deepen their fiscal and political dependence on the party-state, and foster divisions among advocacy groups. This Article underscores the nuanced interplay between authoritarian legality and social movements, demonstrating how legal opportunity structures can be strategically engineered to limit the transformative potential of these groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Comparative Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legality Trap: Legal Co-optation Under Authoritarianism

Yueduan Wang
1 citations
The American Journal of Comparative Law
International Law and Human Rights
8.52
article

The Legality Trap: Legal Co-optation Under Authoritarianism

Yueduan Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In democracies, legal advocacy is known to channel social movements into narrower, less radical paths. However, the extent and conditions under which law co-opts social movements in nondemocratic contexts remain less clear, particularly given the constraints of underdeveloped legal systems and the frequent blending of legal and nonlegal mobilization tactics among societal actors. This Article examines environmental legal mobilization in China as a case study, illustrating how a discriminatory legal opportunity structure—where the judiciary provides a powerful platform for advocacy, yet access and affordability are limited to those demonstrating state-aligned behaviors—serves as an effective mechanism of co-optation under authoritarianism. By permitting environmental NGOs to engage in public interest litigation while tightly regulating their legal standing and financial resources, the party-state has led NGOs to self-moderate their goals and tactics, deepen their fiscal and political dependence on the party-state, and foster divisions among advocacy groups. This Article underscores the nuanced interplay between authoritarian legality and social movements, demonstrating how legal opportunity structures can be strategically engineered to limit the transformative potential of these groups.

The American Journal of Comparative LawVol. 73(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Law and Human Rights
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Legality Trap: Legal Co-optation Under Authoritarianism — Yueduan Wang · The American Journal of Comparative Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS