SELECTED CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING WORKING CONDITIONS – A CASE STUDY

The purpose of this article is to analyze the working conditions of university employees in the context of health, safety and ergonomics, with a particular focus on the challenges of computer work.In the face of dynamic technological changes, prolonged use of digital devices can negatively affect vision, musculoskeletal system and mental well-being.The survey was designed to identify areas for improvement and incorporate the perspective of employees in shaping the work environment.Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted using a questionnaire aimed at administrative, research and teaching staff at one of the universities.The questionnaire covered four key areas: work environment, technical equipment, ergonomics of the computer workstation and work organization.The collected data was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to identify strengths and problem areas.Findings: Analysis of the results showed that while there are positive aspects of the work environment, there are also significant deficiencies in ergonomics, health and safety.Employees reported the need for better adjustment of workstations, especially in terms of ergonomics of computer equipment and more efficient organization of duties.Respondents' opinions provided valuable information that can form the basis for implementing specific improvements. Research limitations/implications:The survey is limited to a single institution and is based on respondents' subjective evaluations.Further research could include a comparison between different universities and an expansion of the methodology to include job observation. Practical implications:The results of the survey can be used as a basis for developing recommendations for improving working conditions, such as by implementing ergonomic solutions and systematically monitoring employee feedback.Social implications: Improving the ergonomics and well-being of workers can positively affect their psychophysical health, work efficiency and overall quality of life.Originality/value: The article brings new knowledge about academics' perceptions of their working conditions and highlights the value of their voices in improving the work environment.