AI Coding Tools in Bilingual Software Development: A Survey of Spanish-Speaking Developers

AI coding tools can boost software-development productivity, yet their English-dominated training data pose challenges for non-English-speaking developers. In Ecuador's bilingual context—Spanish drives workflows while English is essential for APIs and documentation—these tools fail to parse non-English code elements, including Spanish identifiers, causing inefficiency and mistrust. This study investigates perceptions and challenges among 65 developers—45 Spanish-survey (ES) and 20 English-survey (EN) respondents, all native Spanish speakers with varying English skills. Using mixed methods we surveyed tool usage, linguistic barriers, and desired enhancements. Participants use AI assistants to automate routine tasks but report issues when suggestions span multiple files or ignore local naming conventions. ES respondents abandon recommendations more often than EN peers (25% vs 17.9%), indicating linguistic inequities rather than programming expertise. Qualitative analyzes highlight three needs: (i) multilingual NLP that understands hybrid Spanish-English code, (ii) context-aware generation that adapts to regional API norms, and (iii) transparent feedback that exposes provenance and confidence for verification. We argue that balanced Spanish-English corpora and bilingual tokenisers are pragmatic steps toward these goals, enabling automation while preserving developers' reasoning skills. Though limited by a modest convenience sample and self-reported practices, this work provides the first empirical snapshot of AI coding-tool adoption in Latin America and underscores the need for inclusive, context-sensitive tools to foster equitable software-engineering advancement globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696630.3731670
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robotics and Automated Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Coding Tools in Bilingual Software Development: A Survey of Spanish-Speaking Developers

Mark van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Miguel Botto-Tobar
1 citations
Robotics and Automated Systems
1.21
article

AI Coding Tools in Bilingual Software Development: A Survey of Spanish-Speaking Developers

Mark van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Miguel Botto-Tobar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AI coding tools can boost software-development productivity, yet their English-dominated training data pose challenges for non-English-speaking developers. In Ecuador's bilingual context—Spanish drives workflows while English is essential for APIs and documentation—these tools fail to parse non-English code elements, including Spanish identifiers, causing inefficiency and mistrust. This study investigates perceptions and challenges among 65 developers—45 Spanish-survey (ES) and 20 English-survey (EN) respondents, all native Spanish speakers with varying English skills. Using mixed methods we surveyed tool usage, linguistic barriers, and desired enhancements. Participants use AI assistants to automate routine tasks but report issues when suggestions span multiple files or ignore local naming conventions. ES respondents abandon recommendations more often than EN peers (25% vs 17.9%), indicating linguistic inequities rather than programming expertise. Qualitative analyzes highlight three needs: (i) multilingual NLP that understands hybrid Spanish-English code, (ii) context-aware generation that adapts to regional API norms, and (iii) transparent feedback that exposes provenance and confidence for verification. We argue that balanced Spanish-English corpora and bilingual tokenisers are pragmatic steps toward these goals, enabling automation while preserving developers' reasoning skills. Though limited by a modest convenience sample and self-reported practices, this work provides the first empirical snapshot of AI coding-tool adoption in Latin America and underscores the need for inclusive, context-sensitive tools to foster equitable software-engineering advancement globally.

University of Guayaquil (EC), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Robotics and Automated Systems
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.