A Practical Method To Evaluate Surgical Access In Low-middle Income Countries

Introduction: Access and availability of timely, quality surgical services remain a problem in low-middle income countries. Easily obtainable measures such as the facilities caesarian section ratio and whether a facility can complete and care for a patient undergoing a damage control laparotomy, are needed to evaluate access to surgical services. This current study aims to evaluate surgical access and resources allocation at primary, district, and tertiary level facilities (public and private) throughout Botswana. These data have the potential to help guide future surgical resource allocation in other low-middle income countries throughout the world. Methods: Caesarian section ratio was calculated based on the ratio of caesarian sections to total surgical procedures completed during the data collection timeframe (June 2022 - June 2023). Total surgical procedures included all procedures performed in an operating theater requiring local, general, spinal, or regional anesthesia. Data was collected from a selection of primary, district, and tertiary facilities throughout Botswana. Results: A total of 7 primary, 3 district, and 2 tertiary facilities were included. Most facilities (10/12) were public. More surgical procedures were completed at tertiary compared to primary and district level facilities, 4889 (555) vs 379 (368); mean (SD), respectively. Tertiary facilities had lower caesarian section ratios than primary and district level facilities, 19 (17) v 64 (27); mean (SD). Private facilities had lower caesarian section ratios than public facilities, 13 (10) v 65 (25); mean (SD). Only tertiary level facilities were able to complete damage control laparotomies. Conclusion: The caesarian section ratio can be easily obtained and dynamically followed to provide feedback on surgical resource utilization. The high caesarian section ratio seen in public facilities demonstrates an unmet surgical need, with resources asymmetrically devoted to perinatal care. Tertiary level facilities can complete damage control laparotomies, showing that surgical resources are available in Botswana.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52648/icigs.1003_60
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Practical Method To Evaluate Surgical Access In Low-middle Income Countries

A. L. Johnson, Scott Hanson, Adam L. Kushner, Maliha Shaikh et al.
Global Health and Surgery
article

A Practical Method To Evaluate Surgical Access In Low-middle Income Countries

A. L. Johnson, Scott Hanson, Adam L. Kushner, Maliha Shaikh, Karabo Ngwako, Tlotlo Nthibo, Beatrice Mahlaya Mahlaya, Tshepo Otsile
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Access and availability of timely, quality surgical services remain a problem in low-middle income countries. Easily obtainable measures such as the facilities caesarian section ratio and whether a facility can complete and care for a patient undergoing a damage control laparotomy, are needed to evaluate access to surgical services. This current study aims to evaluate surgical access and resources allocation at primary, district, and tertiary level facilities (public and private) throughout Botswana. These data have the potential to help guide future surgical resource allocation in other low-middle income countries throughout the world. Methods: Caesarian section ratio was calculated based on the ratio of caesarian sections to total surgical procedures completed during the data collection timeframe (June 2022 - June 2023). Total surgical procedures included all procedures performed in an operating theater requiring local, general, spinal, or regional anesthesia. Data was collected from a selection of primary, district, and tertiary facilities throughout Botswana. Results: A total of 7 primary, 3 district, and 2 tertiary facilities were included. Most facilities (10/12) were public. More surgical procedures were completed at tertiary compared to primary and district level facilities, 4889 (555) vs 379 (368); mean (SD), respectively. Tertiary facilities had lower caesarian section ratios than primary and district level facilities, 19 (17) v 64 (27); mean (SD). Private facilities had lower caesarian section ratios than public facilities, 13 (10) v 65 (25); mean (SD). Only tertiary level facilities were able to complete damage control laparotomies. Conclusion: The caesarian section ratio can be easily obtained and dynamically followed to provide feedback on surgical resource utilization. The high caesarian section ratio seen in public facilities demonstrates an unmet surgical need, with resources asymmetrically devoted to perinatal care. Tertiary level facilities can complete damage control laparotomies, showing that surgical resources are available in Botswana.

(2)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Practical Method To Evaluate Surgical Access In Low-middle Income Countries — A. L. Johnson, Scott Hanson, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS