Thinking Like Losers

For environmental thinkers of different stripes—from techno-scientific ‘eco-pragmatists’ to climate activists—the concept of human failure—whether psychological, moral, or spiritual—is at odds with the language of hope needed to generate meaningful action. As Clingerman’s work on geo-engineering attests, failing to adequately meet the challenge of climate and ecological crisis is frequently expressed as a state to be overcome, through divine or human techno-scientific intervention. Against such a view, I want to propose failure as generative of environmental ethical thinking, particularly in times of mass extinction and irrecoverable ecological devastation. I do this by linking failure with two concepts that have become important to environmental humanities scholars: first, the concept of mourning as an ethical disposition (via the philosophies of Benjamin, Freud, and Derrida) that can foster more just, compassionate and sustainable ways of living. Second, inviting further interaction with Clingerman’s work, I propose to link failure to the concept of environmental hermeneutics, by understanding language itself as a sign of human failure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil202577148
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking Like Losers

Stefan Skrimshire
Environmental Philosophy
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Thinking Like Losers

Stefan Skrimshire
article en

Abstract

For environmental thinkers of different stripes—from techno-scientific ‘eco-pragmatists’ to climate activists—the concept of human failure—whether psychological, moral, or spiritual—is at odds with the language of hope needed to generate meaningful action. As Clingerman’s work on geo-engineering attests, failing to adequately meet the challenge of climate and ecological crisis is frequently expressed as a state to be overcome, through divine or human techno-scientific intervention. Against such a view, I want to propose failure as generative of environmental ethical thinking, particularly in times of mass extinction and irrecoverable ecological devastation. I do this by linking failure with two concepts that have become important to environmental humanities scholars: first, the concept of mourning as an ethical disposition (via the philosophies of Benjamin, Freud, and Derrida) that can foster more just, compassionate and sustainable ways of living. Second, inviting further interaction with Clingerman’s work, I propose to link failure to the concept of environmental hermeneutics, by understanding language itself as a sign of human failure.

Environmental PhilosophyVol. 22(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thinking Like Losers — Stefan Skrimshire · Environmental Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS