St. Alphosus Liguori and His Scholastic Sources on Sensitive—but Controverted—Questions on Marital Chastity

The present essay considers a controversy that erupted over Christopher West’s claim that anal copulation is a morally permissible form of foreplay between spouses so long as the marital act culminates within the wife’s vagina. His thinking is that, so long as the possibility of begetting new life is not impeded, any act of sexual stimulation between spouses is morally licit. West was both criticized and defended by a number of prominent Catholic thinkers for his claim. What few appreciate, however, is that this matter was already thoroughly examined by many scholastic moral theologians and even by St. Alphonsus Liguori. In this essay, I consider some important scholastic authors’ thinking on this topic in order to shed more light on the contemporary debate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq20252516
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

St. Alphosus Liguori and His Scholastic Sources on Sensitive—but Controverted—Questions on Marital Chastity

Victor M. Salas
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

St. Alphosus Liguori and His Scholastic Sources on Sensitive—but Controverted—Questions on Marital Chastity

Victor M. Salas
article en

Abstract

The present essay considers a controversy that erupted over Christopher West’s claim that anal copulation is a morally permissible form of foreplay between spouses so long as the marital act culminates within the wife’s vagina. His thinking is that, so long as the possibility of begetting new life is not impeded, any act of sexual stimulation between spouses is morally licit. West was both criticized and defended by a number of prominent Catholic thinkers for his claim. What few appreciate, however, is that this matter was already thoroughly examined by many scholastic moral theologians and even by St. Alphonsus Liguori. In this essay, I consider some important scholastic authors’ thinking on this topic in order to shed more light on the contemporary debate.

The National Catholic Bioethics QuarterlyVol. 25(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.