A Comparative Study of Few Classifications Techniques

A comparative study of the performance of three classifiers, Logistic regression, Discriminant analysis, Naïve Bayes’ classifier was conducted using the ‘Credit card defaulter’ data. The relative comparison of the classifiers was done using measure of accuracy and precision obtained from the confusion matrix. Cross validation technique was used while constructing the confusion matrix. Study showed that Logistic regression provided better performance based on accuracy measure from the confusion matrix (77.88% accuracy) compared to the other two and the accuracy level of Bayes’ classifier was the least (36.22%). The results of these study are limited to this particular data set and hence cannot be extended as a general result.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.120700010
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Few Classifications Techniques

James Kurian
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

A Comparative Study of Few Classifications Techniques

James Kurian
article en

Abstract

A comparative study of the performance of three classifiers, Logistic regression, Discriminant analysis, Naïve Bayes’ classifier was conducted using the ‘Credit card defaulter’ data. The relative comparison of the classifiers was done using measure of accuracy and precision obtained from the confusion matrix. Cross validation technique was used while constructing the confusion matrix. Study showed that Logistic regression provided better performance based on accuracy measure from the confusion matrix (77.88% accuracy) compared to the other two and the accuracy level of Bayes’ classifier was the least (36.22%). The results of these study are limited to this particular data set and hence cannot be extended as a general result.

International journal of research and scientific innovationVol. XII(VII)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.