Feasibility, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Use Among Individuals with Neurological Conditions: A Mixed Methods Study

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Virtual reality (VR) offers a multidimensional simulated reality built with digital formats and can be characterized as semi-immersive (single projection screen) or fully-immersive (head-mounted display). Although VR is an emerging intervention for the rehabilitation of individuals with neurological disorders, research on fully-immersive technologies and the patient experience is limited. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of using off-the-shelf, fully-immersive VR with adults following neurological impairment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Mixed-methods study including 18 participants with a mean standard deviation (SD) age of 67.11 (12.12) years, asked to complete 20 minutes of dynamic rhythm-based VR activity in sitting. Outcomes included the pre- and postactivity VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ), physiological data (maximum heart rate and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]), the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ), and a structured interview. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. VRSQ scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative analysis consisted of thematic analysis of interviews. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median interquartile range (IQR) pre- and postactivity VRSQ scores were 7.50 (0-19.58) and 7.92 (0-19.38), respectively. Differences in scores were not statistically significant (Z = 0, <i>P</i> = 1.00). The median USEQ score was 27.50 (25.00-28.25). The mean percentage of maximal heart rate achieved was 63 (10) %, with a median RPE score of 10.50 (8.25-12.75). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of enjoyment and beneficial therapeutic challenges as facilitators of VR use. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A single session of fully-immersive off-the-shelf VR yielded promising integrated findings related to the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of this type of intervention for a sample of individuals with a variety of neurological conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Games for Health Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2161783x251361941
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Use Among Individuals with Neurological Conditions: A Mixed Methods Study

Molly Watkins, Daniel Stam, Michele S. Olson, Brea Galyen et al.
1 links
Games for Health Journal
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Use Among Individuals with Neurological Conditions: A Mixed Methods Study

Molly Watkins, Daniel Stam, Michele S. Olson, Brea Galyen, Kaitlyn Vomhof
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Virtual reality (VR) offers a multidimensional simulated reality built with digital formats and can be characterized as semi-immersive (single projection screen) or fully-immersive (head-mounted display). Although VR is an emerging intervention for the rehabilitation of individuals with neurological disorders, research on fully-immersive technologies and the patient experience is limited. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of using off-the-shelf, fully-immersive VR with adults following neurological impairment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Mixed-methods study including 18 participants with a mean standard deviation (SD) age of 67.11 (12.12) years, asked to complete 20 minutes of dynamic rhythm-based VR activity in sitting. Outcomes included the pre- and postactivity VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ), physiological data (maximum heart rate and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]), the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ), and a structured interview. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. VRSQ scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative analysis consisted of thematic analysis of interviews. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median interquartile range (IQR) pre- and postactivity VRSQ scores were 7.50 (0-19.58) and 7.92 (0-19.38), respectively. Differences in scores were not statistically significant (Z = 0, <i>P</i> = 1.00). The median USEQ score was 27.50 (25.00-28.25). The mean percentage of maximal heart rate achieved was 63 (10) %, with a median RPE score of 10.50 (8.25-12.75). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of enjoyment and beneficial therapeutic challenges as facilitators of VR use. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A single session of fully-immersive off-the-shelf VR yielded promising integrated findings related to the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of this type of intervention for a sample of individuals with a variety of neurological conditions.

Games for Health JournalVol. 14(6)
College of St. Scholastica (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.