Investigating the Spatial Biases and Temporal Trends in Insect Pollinator Occurrence Data on GBIF

Research in biogeography, ecology, and biodiversity hinges on the availability of comprehensive datasets that detail species distributions and environmental conditions. At the forefront of this endeavor is the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). This study focuses on investigating spatial biases and temporal trends in insect pollinator occurrence data within the GBIF dataset, specifically focusing on three pivotal pollinator groups: bees, hoverflies, and butterflies. Addressing these gaps in GBIF data is essential for comprehensive analyses and informed pollinator conservation efforts. We obtained occurrence data from GBIF for seven bee families, six butterfly families, and the Syrphidae family of hoverflies in 2024. Spatial biases were addressed by eliminating duplicate records with identical latitude and longitude coordinates. Species richness was assessed for each family and country. Temporal trends were examined by tallying annual occurrence records for each pollinator family, and the diversity of data sources within GBIF was evaluated by quantifying unique data publishers. We identified initial occurrence counts of 4,922,390 for bees, 1,703,131 for hoverflies, and 31,700,696 for butterflies, with a substantial portion containing duplicate records. On average, 81.4% of bee data, 77.2% of hoverfly data, and 65.4% of butterfly data were removed post-duplicate elimination for dataset refinement. Our dataset encompassed 9286 unique bee species, 2574 hoverfly species, and 17,895 butterfly species. Our temporal analysis revealed a notable trend in data recording, with 80% of bee and butterfly data collected after 2022, and a similar threshold for hoverflies reached after 2023. The United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Sweden consistently emerged as the top countries for occurrence data across all three groups. The analysis of data publishers highlighted iNaturalist.org as a top contributor to bee data. Overall, we uncovered significant biases in the occurrence data of pollinators from GBIF. These biases pose substantial challenges for future research on pollinator ecology and biodiversity conservation.