Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Inhomogeneity-Corrected Dose Distribution in Prophylactic Radiotherapy for Heterotopic Ossification

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of inhomogeneity correction (IC) of dose distribution on the dosimetric and radiobiological efficacy of radiation treatment for heterotopic ossification (HO). <b>Methods:</b> This study involved a retrospective analysis of 21 patients treated using a homogeneous dose distribution plan for hip prophylactic HO. These IC-off plans were evaluated against an IC-on dose distribution plan. Dosimetric and corresponding radiobiological parameters (gEUD, LQ-EUD, LQ, EQD2 for α/β = 3 and 10 Gy) were calculated. These parameters were compared for both treatment plans. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using mean and standard deviation values from baseline data to generate 10,000 synthetic datasets, allowing for robust statistical modeling of variability in dose distributions and biological outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The homogeneous (IC-off) plans demonstrated overestimation of dose conformity and uniformity, reflected in lower HI values (0.10 ± 0.05 vs. 0.18 ± 0.05) and higher D<sub>90%</sub>-D<sub>98%</sub> coverage. Radiobiologically, these plans yielded higher gEUD (7.02 Gy vs. 6.80 Gy) and EQD2 values across all α/β scenarios (e.g., EQD2<sub>[α/β=3]_gEUD</sub> = 14.07 Gy vs. 13.35 Gy), with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although IC-on plans demonstrated steeper dose gradients (higher GIs), this came at the expense of internal dose variability and potentially compromised biological effectiveness. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that plans without IC deliver suboptimal biological effectiveness if continued preferentially in routine HO prophylaxis. With advanced radiation dose calculation algorithms available in all centers, inhomogeneity-corrected doses warrant prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155291
Primary Topic
Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Inhomogeneity-Corrected Dose Distribution in Prophylactic Radiotherapy for Heterotopic Ossification

Indra J. Das, Than S. Kehwar
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
article

Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Inhomogeneity-Corrected Dose Distribution in Prophylactic Radiotherapy for Heterotopic Ossification

Indra J. Das, Than S. Kehwar
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of inhomogeneity correction (IC) of dose distribution on the dosimetric and radiobiological efficacy of radiation treatment for heterotopic ossification (HO). <b>Methods:</b> This study involved a retrospective analysis of 21 patients treated using a homogeneous dose distribution plan for hip prophylactic HO. These IC-off plans were evaluated against an IC-on dose distribution plan. Dosimetric and corresponding radiobiological parameters (gEUD, LQ-EUD, LQ, EQD2 for α/β = 3 and 10 Gy) were calculated. These parameters were compared for both treatment plans. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using mean and standard deviation values from baseline data to generate 10,000 synthetic datasets, allowing for robust statistical modeling of variability in dose distributions and biological outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The homogeneous (IC-off) plans demonstrated overestimation of dose conformity and uniformity, reflected in lower HI values (0.10 ± 0.05 vs. 0.18 ± 0.05) and higher D<sub>90%</sub>-D<sub>98%</sub> coverage. Radiobiologically, these plans yielded higher gEUD (7.02 Gy vs. 6.80 Gy) and EQD2 values across all α/β scenarios (e.g., EQD2<sub>[α/β=3]_gEUD</sub> = 14.07 Gy vs. 13.35 Gy), with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although IC-on plans demonstrated steeper dose gradients (higher GIs), this came at the expense of internal dose variability and potentially compromised biological effectiveness. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that plans without IC deliver suboptimal biological effectiveness if continued preferentially in routine HO prophylaxis. With advanced radiation dose calculation algorithms available in all centers, inhomogeneity-corrected doses warrant prospective validation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(15)
Northwestern University (US), Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.