A Framework for Archaeological Involvement with Human Genetic Data for European Prehistory

Abstract A concern with ethics and commitments to ethical conduct and standards has increasingly been raised within archaeology, recently also concerning aDNA data. We suggest that codes, whether for working with ancient DNA or other archaeological practices, need to be multi-faceted, or layered, to reflect the different situational contexts of research. We further argue for a more reflexive text addressing “issues of attention” or “concerns.” We address a number of concerns that should be considered and balanced against each other in the research process. They include respect, rights, appropriation, access, and collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Archaeology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2025-0053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Archaeological Involvement with Human Genetic Data for European Prehistory

Marie Louise Stig Sørensen, Eske Willerslev, Daniela Hofmann, Rasmus Nielsen et al.
1 citations
Open Archaeology
Forensic and Genetic Research
1.82
article

A Framework for Archaeological Involvement with Human Genetic Data for European Prehistory

Marie Louise Stig Sørensen, Eske Willerslev, Daniela Hofmann, Rasmus Nielsen, Fabrice Demeter, Kristian Kristiansen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A concern with ethics and commitments to ethical conduct and standards has increasingly been raised within archaeology, recently also concerning aDNA data. We suggest that codes, whether for working with ancient DNA or other archaeological practices, need to be multi-faceted, or layered, to reflect the different situational contexts of research. We further argue for a more reflexive text addressing “issues of attention” or “concerns.” We address a number of concerns that should be considered and balanced against each other in the research process. They include respect, rights, appropriation, access, and collaboration.

Open ArchaeologyVol. 11(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Cambridge (GB), Integrative Medicine Institute (US), Éco-Anthropologie (FR), Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Sociale (FR), University of Bergen (NO), University of Gothenburg (SE)
European Commission, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Forensic and Genetic Research
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.