Explore and Interpret the Psychology of Kim Jong-Un: Understanding the Mindset of North Korea’s Leader and Its Implications for Foreign Policy in the Trump’s Return

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has exhibited irrational and unpredictable behavior, including the bombing of a South Korean airliner in 1987, which resulted in the loss of 115 lives (Kim, 1993, 2023), and an attempted assassination of the President of South Korea in Rangoon (Jung, 2023). These actions led former U.S. President George W. Bush to label the DPRK as part of an “axis of evil” in 2002, indicating a perceived threat to global security (Glass, 2019; Kotch, 2003). Later, President Donald Trump intensified this rhetoric with terms like “fire and fury” and “rocket man” (Keneally, 2018). Despite the DPRK regime and Kim Jong-Un’s involvement in kidnappings, hijackings, and assassinations, these extreme behaviors do not necessarily indicate that Kim suffers from a mental disorder. As Borum (2010) notes, “Mental illness is not a critical factor in explaining terrorist behavior, and most terrorists are not psychopaths.” Therefore, it is more plausible that Kim Jong-Un’s actions are driven by political and power considerations rather than mental illness. This essay explores the personality formation of Kim Jong-Un from a psychological perspective. The first part examines various psychological and diplomatic theories briefly. The second part introduces multiple examples to illustrate these theories, discussing DPRK foreign policy under the Trump 2.0 era and exploring its potential implications and consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.137032
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explore and Interpret the Psychology of Kim Jong-Un: Understanding the Mindset of North Korea’s Leader and Its Implications for Foreign Policy in the Trump’s Return

Yat Ming Chu
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Explore and Interpret the Psychology of Kim Jong-Un: Understanding the Mindset of North Korea’s Leader and Its Implications for Foreign Policy in the Trump’s Return

Yat Ming Chu
article en

Abstract

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has exhibited irrational and unpredictable behavior, including the bombing of a South Korean airliner in 1987, which resulted in the loss of 115 lives (Kim, 1993, 2023), and an attempted assassination of the President of South Korea in Rangoon (Jung, 2023). These actions led former U.S. President George W. Bush to label the DPRK as part of an “axis of evil” in 2002, indicating a perceived threat to global security (Glass, 2019; Kotch, 2003). Later, President Donald Trump intensified this rhetoric with terms like “fire and fury” and “rocket man” (Keneally, 2018). Despite the DPRK regime and Kim Jong-Un’s involvement in kidnappings, hijackings, and assassinations, these extreme behaviors do not necessarily indicate that Kim suffers from a mental disorder. As Borum (2010) notes, “Mental illness is not a critical factor in explaining terrorist behavior, and most terrorists are not psychopaths.” Therefore, it is more plausible that Kim Jong-Un’s actions are driven by political and power considerations rather than mental illness. This essay explores the personality formation of Kim Jong-Un from a psychological perspective. The first part examines various psychological and diplomatic theories briefly. The second part introduces multiple examples to illustrate these theories, discussing DPRK foreign policy under the Trump 2.0 era and exploring its potential implications and consequences.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(07)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.