Revisiting Islam–State Relationship: Critical Analysis of Indonesian Policy on Islamic Boarding Schools

Pondok pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) are the oldest Islamic educational institutions that have experienced significant development in Indonesia. A total of 26,975 pondok pesantren are currently spread across all regions. However, the state’s acknowledgment of these schools only came about in 2019, marked by the issuance of Law Number 18. Although enacted four or five years ago, this law has not been applied evenly in various regions. Therefore, this study aims to examine the law by focusing on its background, content and implications for the future of pondok pesantren. It also focuses on its political impact on the relationship between the state and Islam in Indonesia. The data presented were based on a systematic review of Law Number 18 of 2019, relevant regulations, policy documents and interviews with key policymakers. T he data were analysed based on the theory of social movement. This study pointed out that first, enacting the law is not merely a form of state recognition of the pondok pesantren, as it has been stated in previous studies, but rather influenced by the factor of structural opportunity to realise the desire of the pondok pesantren to obtain financial support that have never been granted by the state. On the other hand, enacting the law was a political strategy to intervene in Islamic groups to support the ruling government. Second, the strong political interests at the local government level and the contestation among religious groups have caused the law has not been implemented evenly in various regions in Indonesia. This means that although the enactment of the Law juridically can be considered as a policy that strengthens the Islam-state relationship, but it is still problematic at the implementation level.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2024.39.2.16
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Islam–State Relationship: Critical Analysis of Indonesian Policy on Islamic Boarding Schools

Abdul Rozak, Saparudin Saparudin, Ika Nur Fitriani
1 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
1.13
article

Revisiting Islam–State Relationship: Critical Analysis of Indonesian Policy on Islamic Boarding Schools

Abdul Rozak, Saparudin Saparudin, Ika Nur Fitriani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pondok pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) are the oldest Islamic educational institutions that have experienced significant development in Indonesia. A total of 26,975 pondok pesantren are currently spread across all regions. However, the state’s acknowledgment of these schools only came about in 2019, marked by the issuance of Law Number 18. Although enacted four or five years ago, this law has not been applied evenly in various regions. Therefore, this study aims to examine the law by focusing on its background, content and implications for the future of pondok pesantren. It also focuses on its political impact on the relationship between the state and Islam in Indonesia. The data presented were based on a systematic review of Law Number 18 of 2019, relevant regulations, policy documents and interviews with key policymakers. T he data were analysed based on the theory of social movement. This study pointed out that first, enacting the law is not merely a form of state recognition of the pondok pesantren, as it has been stated in previous studies, but rather influenced by the factor of structural opportunity to realise the desire of the pondok pesantren to obtain financial support that have never been granted by the state. On the other hand, enacting the law was a political strategy to intervene in Islamic groups to support the ruling government. Second, the strong political interests at the local government level and the contestation among religious groups have caused the law has not been implemented evenly in various regions in Indonesia. This means that although the enactment of the Law juridically can be considered as a policy that strengthens the Islam-state relationship, but it is still problematic at the implementation level.

Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and EducationVol. 39(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.