Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Diagnostic Modality for Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Keratoconus is a degenerative corneal disorder leading to vision impairment. It is important to detect it early to prevent its progression by corneal cross-linking (CXL). Keratoconus is diagnosed using videokeratography and Scheimpflug tomography, which provide valuable data on the corneal surface. However, distinguishing keratoconus from normal variations remains challenging. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising improvements in detecting subtle corneal changes, enhancing keratoconus detection and diagnosis. Purpose: To analyze AI as a diagnostic modality for keratoconus by calculating the pooled sensitivity and specificity to evaluate its accuracy. Methods: Databases involved PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, and Science Direct, from 2018 to March 2024. Also, to include unpublished works, the grey literature was searched, using the OpenGrey repository. Studies were included when they met the inclusion criteria. Results: We involved a total of 19 studies in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for detecting keratoconus was 95% confidence interval (CI) (91% to 98%), with a pooled specificity of 98% CI (96% to 99%). Additionally, the random forest model had a pooled sensitivity of 98.11% (CI, 96.77% to 99.44%), with a pooled specificity of 99% (CI, 98.24% to 99.76%). On the other hand, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model had a pooled sensitivity of 89.73% CI (79.77% to 99.69%), with a pooled specificity of 95.27% CI (91.88% to 98.66%). Conclusion: The results confirmed the reliability of different AI models in diagnosing keratoconus, especially the random forest model. This is important, as the early and accurate detection of keratoconus provides opportunities to reduce risk factors and offer treatments, including CXL, which can potentially slow its progression and improve the patient’s quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20473/vsehj.v4i3.2025.72-80
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Diagnostic Modality for Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Ali Jasem Buabbas, Faisal Aljassar, Yousif Alqabandi, Ali Bulbanat et al.
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Diagnostic Modality for Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Ali Jasem Buabbas, Faisal Aljassar, Yousif Alqabandi, Ali Bulbanat, Sayed A. Yousef Alzalzalah
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Keratoconus is a degenerative corneal disorder leading to vision impairment. It is important to detect it early to prevent its progression by corneal cross-linking (CXL). Keratoconus is diagnosed using videokeratography and Scheimpflug tomography, which provide valuable data on the corneal surface. However, distinguishing keratoconus from normal variations remains challenging. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising improvements in detecting subtle corneal changes, enhancing keratoconus detection and diagnosis. Purpose: To analyze AI as a diagnostic modality for keratoconus by calculating the pooled sensitivity and specificity to evaluate its accuracy. Methods: Databases involved PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, and Science Direct, from 2018 to March 2024. Also, to include unpublished works, the grey literature was searched, using the OpenGrey repository. Studies were included when they met the inclusion criteria. Results: We involved a total of 19 studies in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for detecting keratoconus was 95% confidence interval (CI) (91% to 98%), with a pooled specificity of 98% CI (96% to 99%). Additionally, the random forest model had a pooled sensitivity of 98.11% (CI, 96.77% to 99.44%), with a pooled specificity of 99% (CI, 98.24% to 99.76%). On the other hand, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model had a pooled sensitivity of 89.73% CI (79.77% to 99.69%), with a pooled specificity of 95.27% CI (91.88% to 98.66%). Conclusion: The results confirmed the reliability of different AI models in diagnosing keratoconus, especially the random forest model. This is important, as the early and accurate detection of keratoconus provides opportunities to reduce risk factors and offer treatments, including CXL, which can potentially slow its progression and improve the patient’s quality of life.

Vision Science and Eye Health JournalVol. 4(3)
Kuwait University (KW), Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization (KW), Ministry of Health (KW), Ibn Sina Hospital (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.