ENHANCING INSTANCE SELECTION WITH ENSEMBLE METHODS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND DATA COMPRESSION ACROSS MULTIPLE ALGORITHMS

Instance selection is a crucial preprocessing step aimed at reducing the computational complexity of machine learning models, particularly when integrated with feature selection and dimensionality reduction techniques. This process enhances the overall prediction accuracy by selecting the most representative instances and removing redundant or irrelevant data points. While instance selection has been widely studied, the application of ensemble methods to instance selection remains underexplored in existing literature. Ensemble methods, known for their ability to combine multiple models to improve predictive performance, offer a promising avenue for refining instance selection strategies. In this study, we explore the efficacy of four ensemble strategies voting, feature bagging, Additive Noise, and Bagging when applied to a diverse set of nine instance selection algorithms: CNN, ENN, GE, IB2, IB3, All-KNN, RMHC, MC, and RENN. The goal is to determine how well these ensemble methods can enhance the performance of individual instance selection algorithms in terms of accuracy and compression efficiency. The experimental evaluation is conducted in three distinct phases. In the first phase, we focus on assessing the accuracy and data compression capabilities of each instance selection method on a specific dataset. This phase establishes a baseline performance metric for the instance selection algorithms and provides an understanding of how well they generalize across different types of data. The second phase involves evaluating the performance of the four ensemble strategies across six different datasets. This phase aims to assess the robustness of ensemble methods in improving the accuracy of instance selection algorithms, especially when dealing with diverse data characteristics. The ensemble methods are expected to offer a more stable and generalized solution compared to individual instance selection techniques, potentially leading to improved prediction results. In the final phase, we conduct a comparative analysis of the compression effectiveness of the nine instance selection algorithms, both individually and within the ensemble frameworks, across the six datasets. By comparing the compression ratios achieved by each method, we aim to identify the most efficient instance selection techniques that retain key information while reducing the size of the data for subsequent modeling. This analysis is critical for understanding the trade-off between computational efficiency and the preservation of valuable data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr553
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENHANCING INSTANCE SELECTION WITH ENSEMBLE METHODS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND DATA COMPRESSION ACROSS MULTIPLE ALGORITHMS

Hira Batool, Arwin Arif, Hassan Ahmad, Muhammad Usman Khalid et al.
1 links
Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Advanced Data Compression Techniques
article

ENHANCING INSTANCE SELECTION WITH ENSEMBLE METHODS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND DATA COMPRESSION ACROSS MULTIPLE ALGORITHMS

Hira Batool, Arwin Arif, Hassan Ahmad, Muhammad Usman Khalid, Syed Zohair Quain Haider
article en

Abstract

Instance selection is a crucial preprocessing step aimed at reducing the computational complexity of machine learning models, particularly when integrated with feature selection and dimensionality reduction techniques. This process enhances the overall prediction accuracy by selecting the most representative instances and removing redundant or irrelevant data points. While instance selection has been widely studied, the application of ensemble methods to instance selection remains underexplored in existing literature. Ensemble methods, known for their ability to combine multiple models to improve predictive performance, offer a promising avenue for refining instance selection strategies. In this study, we explore the efficacy of four ensemble strategies voting, feature bagging, Additive Noise, and Bagging when applied to a diverse set of nine instance selection algorithms: CNN, ENN, GE, IB2, IB3, All-KNN, RMHC, MC, and RENN. The goal is to determine how well these ensemble methods can enhance the performance of individual instance selection algorithms in terms of accuracy and compression efficiency. The experimental evaluation is conducted in three distinct phases. In the first phase, we focus on assessing the accuracy and data compression capabilities of each instance selection method on a specific dataset. This phase establishes a baseline performance metric for the instance selection algorithms and provides an understanding of how well they generalize across different types of data. The second phase involves evaluating the performance of the four ensemble strategies across six different datasets. This phase aims to assess the robustness of ensemble methods in improving the accuracy of instance selection algorithms, especially when dealing with diverse data characteristics. The ensemble methods are expected to offer a more stable and generalized solution compared to individual instance selection techniques, potentially leading to improved prediction results. In the final phase, we conduct a comparative analysis of the compression effectiveness of the nine instance selection algorithms, both individually and within the ensemble frameworks, across the six datasets. By comparing the compression ratios achieved by each method, we aim to identify the most efficient instance selection techniques that retain key information while reducing the size of the data for subsequent modeling. This analysis is critical for understanding the trade-off between computational efficiency and the preservation of valuable data.

Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 2(07)
National University of Modern Languages (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Advanced Data Compression Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.