Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Putusan M.A. Nomor 2029_K/Pid.Sus/ 2023 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam

This study analyzes the Supreme Court ruling in the IK case concerning money laundering from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. This research employs a normative juridical method, analyzing primary and secondary legal sources. In this study, the author utilizes theories of sanction imposition, judicial consideration, progressive law, justice, and Maqashid al-Shari'ah. The findings indicate that the cassation ruling rejecting the defendant's appeal reflects the Supreme Court's commitment to law enforcement. However, the initial verdict is deemed to inadequately fulfill the principles of justice given the significant losses suffered by the victim. In Islamic criminal law, the actions are categorized as jarimah ta'zir, as they meet the elements of embezzlement (ghulul) and fraud (khilda). This study emphasizes the need for stricter punishments as a form of accountability for actions taken and a deterrent effect and protection for society in accordance with Islamic law and national law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ulumuddin Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v15i1.2802
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Putusan M.A. Nomor 2029_K/Pid.Sus/ 2023 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam

Samsul Anwar, Didi Sumardi, Erika Novianti
Ulumuddin Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Putusan M.A. Nomor 2029_K/Pid.Sus/ 2023 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam

Samsul Anwar, Didi Sumardi, Erika Novianti
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the Supreme Court ruling in the IK case concerning money laundering from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. This research employs a normative juridical method, analyzing primary and secondary legal sources. In this study, the author utilizes theories of sanction imposition, judicial consideration, progressive law, justice, and Maqashid al-Shari'ah. The findings indicate that the cassation ruling rejecting the defendant's appeal reflects the Supreme Court's commitment to law enforcement. However, the initial verdict is deemed to inadequately fulfill the principles of justice given the significant losses suffered by the victim. In Islamic criminal law, the actions are categorized as jarimah ta'zir, as they meet the elements of embezzlement (ghulul) and fraud (khilda). This study emphasizes the need for stricter punishments as a form of accountability for actions taken and a deterrent effect and protection for society in accordance with Islamic law and national law.

Ulumuddin Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu KeislamanVol. 15(1)
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.