The mechanisms by which a whole-school intervention might improve sexual health: qualitative realist research nested in a trial in English secondary schools

Whole-school interventions go beyond classroom education, promoting health by modifying school environments. These can be effective in delaying sexual debut and increasing contraception use but mechanisms are poorly understood. Qualitative research within realist evaluation can explore mechanisms via building 'context-mechanism-outcome configurations', describing how interventions trigger mechanisms that interact with context to generate outcomes. We explored these for the Positive Choices whole-school sexual health intervention within the intervention arm of a randomised trial conducted 2021-2025. Using 'dimensional analysis', we analysed 52 interviews with teachers and 40 focus-groups involving 266 students from 22 English secondary schools. Our results suggest seven mechanisms through which whole-school interventions might 'work': improving knowledge using diverse pedagogies; improving confidence and ability to talk by normalising talk about sexual health; changing gender attitudes through challenging stereotypes and providing insights and empathy with others' perspectives; promoting access to sexual health and other services via helping students understand their needs and entitlements; building school engagement by providing new student roles on decision-making groups; increasing inclusion of sexual-minority students by normalising consideration of non-heterosexual identities and practices; and reducing sexual harassment and abuse by helping students understand consent and when to intervene in harassment. Contextual contingencies included: high initial student needs; teacher skills and commitment; and school commitment and capacity. Our research suggests novel mechanisms via which whole-school interventions might promote sexual health. Quantitative analyses will now be conducted to examine these mechanisms and contingencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118461
Primary Topic
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The mechanisms by which a whole-school intervention might improve sexual health: qualitative realist research nested in a trial in English secondary schools

Charles Opondo, Veena Muraleetharan, Catherine Heather Mercer, Stephen Morris et al.
Social Science & Medicine
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
article

The mechanisms by which a whole-school intervention might improve sexual health: qualitative realist research nested in a trial in English secondary schools

Charles Opondo, Veena Muraleetharan, Catherine Heather Mercer, Stephen Morris, Honor Young, Alison Hadley, Ruth Ponsford, Rona Campbell, G. J. Meléndez‐Torres, Maria Lohan, Joanna Sturgess, Jennifer M. McAllister, Nerissa Tilouche, Karin Coyle, Rebecca Meiksin, Chris P. Bonell, Elizabeth Allen
article en

Abstract

Whole-school interventions go beyond classroom education, promoting health by modifying school environments. These can be effective in delaying sexual debut and increasing contraception use but mechanisms are poorly understood. Qualitative research within realist evaluation can explore mechanisms via building 'context-mechanism-outcome configurations', describing how interventions trigger mechanisms that interact with context to generate outcomes. We explored these for the Positive Choices whole-school sexual health intervention within the intervention arm of a randomised trial conducted 2021-2025. Using 'dimensional analysis', we analysed 52 interviews with teachers and 40 focus-groups involving 266 students from 22 English secondary schools. Our results suggest seven mechanisms through which whole-school interventions might 'work': improving knowledge using diverse pedagogies; improving confidence and ability to talk by normalising talk about sexual health; changing gender attitudes through challenging stereotypes and providing insights and empathy with others' perspectives; promoting access to sexual health and other services via helping students understand their needs and entitlements; building school engagement by providing new student roles on decision-making groups; increasing inclusion of sexual-minority students by normalising consideration of non-heterosexual identities and practices; and reducing sexual harassment and abuse by helping students understand consent and when to intervene in harassment. Contextual contingencies included: high initial student needs; teacher skills and commitment; and school commitment and capacity. Our research suggests novel mechanisms via which whole-school interventions might promote sexual health. Quantitative analyses will now be conducted to examine these mechanisms and contingencies.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 388
Hitotsubashi University (JP), University of London (GB), University of Bedfordshire (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Linnaeus Plant Sciences (Canada) (CA), MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB), Mortimer Market Centre (GB), University College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.