Navigating the safe and just operating space for urban systems: A cross-scale landscape approach

• Assessing urban sustainability requires a multiscale, context-based approach. • Cross-scale interactions, particularly on national and landscape scales, influence urban SJOS. • Significant tradeoffs persist between environmental safety and social goals in urban regions. • Tradeoff between social and environmental goals manifest along the urban-rural-natural landscape gradient. • Cross-scale collaboration is critical for urban sustainability research and practice. Safe and just operating spaces (SJOS) are influenced by complex cross-scale interactions and cascading effects spanning global, regional, and local landscape scales. However, existing SJOS research has often focused on single-scale assessments, overlooking the impacts of multiscale interactions and within-region heterogeneity on urban SJOS. To address this gap, we developed a cross-scale framework for assessing urban SJOS, explicitly incorporating top-down influences from upper-level constraints and bottom-up effects from lower-level heterogeneity. This approach was applied to China’s five major metropolises to examine the states and cross-scale dynamics influencing urban SJOS between 1990 and 2020. Our findings reveal that the SJOS of China’s metropolises were primarily influenced by factors at national and local landscape scales, with weaker influences from the global and continental scales. A persistent trade-off between social justice and environmental safety was identified across spatiotemporal scales. For instance, Chongqing in southwestern China lagged behind the eastern four metropolises in social performance but exhibited stronger environmental safety due to its extensive natural landscapes, which mitigated the anthropogenic impacts of urban centers. Regional issues, such as the overshoot of PM₂.₅ and ecological footprints (EF), were primarily driven by the bottom-up accumulation of localized pressures, while the overshoot of CO₂ was attributed to national policy constraints and the universal exceedance of safe thresholds across scales. Addressing urban sustainability requires avoiding adverse cascading effects from other levels by emphasizing landscape heterogeneity within metropolises and fostering coordinated collaboration across scales, particularly at the regional landscape and national levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and sustainability
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100352
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the safe and just operating space for urban systems: A cross-scale landscape approach

Jie Gao, Jianguo Wu, Hongyan Bian, L Wang et al.
Geography and sustainability
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Navigating the safe and just operating space for urban systems: A cross-scale landscape approach

Jie Gao, Jianguo Wu, Hongyan Bian, L Wang, Runxi Jia, Mengyu Wei, Zhongkui Zhu
article en

Abstract

• Assessing urban sustainability requires a multiscale, context-based approach. • Cross-scale interactions, particularly on national and landscape scales, influence urban SJOS. • Significant tradeoffs persist between environmental safety and social goals in urban regions. • Tradeoff between social and environmental goals manifest along the urban-rural-natural landscape gradient. • Cross-scale collaboration is critical for urban sustainability research and practice. Safe and just operating spaces (SJOS) are influenced by complex cross-scale interactions and cascading effects spanning global, regional, and local landscape scales. However, existing SJOS research has often focused on single-scale assessments, overlooking the impacts of multiscale interactions and within-region heterogeneity on urban SJOS. To address this gap, we developed a cross-scale framework for assessing urban SJOS, explicitly incorporating top-down influences from upper-level constraints and bottom-up effects from lower-level heterogeneity. This approach was applied to China’s five major metropolises to examine the states and cross-scale dynamics influencing urban SJOS between 1990 and 2020. Our findings reveal that the SJOS of China’s metropolises were primarily influenced by factors at national and local landscape scales, with weaker influences from the global and continental scales. A persistent trade-off between social justice and environmental safety was identified across spatiotemporal scales. For instance, Chongqing in southwestern China lagged behind the eastern four metropolises in social performance but exhibited stronger environmental safety due to its extensive natural landscapes, which mitigated the anthropogenic impacts of urban centers. Regional issues, such as the overshoot of PM₂.₅ and ecological footprints (EF), were primarily driven by the bottom-up accumulation of localized pressures, while the overshoot of CO₂ was attributed to national policy constraints and the universal exceedance of safe thresholds across scales. Addressing urban sustainability requires avoiding adverse cascading effects from other levels by emphasizing landscape heterogeneity within metropolises and fostering coordinated collaboration across scales, particularly at the regional landscape and national levels.

Geography and sustainabilityVol. 6(6)
Southwest University (CN), Arizona State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.