Can AI Replace Teachers? The Value of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Education

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly embedded in global education systems, their impact on teaching practices, teacher roles, and student learning requires critical exploration. In the Philippine context, where values formation and relational pedagogy remain foundational, the question of whether AI can replace teachers has become both timely and necessary. This study employed a qualitative phenomenological research design to explore the lived experiences of 25 Filipino educators across public and private institutions in Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework, supported by NVivo software. The study focused on key areas including AI’s pedagogical value, its emotional limitations, ethical concerns, and institutional readiness. Four major themes emerged: (1) AI is viewed as an instructional support tool, not a replacement; (2) the human touch—empathy, mentorship, and moral guidance—remains irreplaceable; (3) significant gaps exist in digital readiness and teacher training; and (4) ethical apprehensions persist around data privacy, academic integrity, and teacher deskilling. Educators recognized AI’s usefulness in streamlining tasks and enhancing personalization, but emphasized that it must be implemented in ways that uphold teacher agency and professional identity. This study reinforces that AI, while beneficial for instructional support, cannot replicate the affective and ethical dimensions of human teaching. The Philippine education system must adopt a teacher-centric AI integration model that addresses infrastructure gaps, strengthens professional development, and embeds ethical safeguards. The findings contribute to emerging discourses on human-centered AI in education and offer timely policy and training insights for sustainable, inclusive, and culturally grounded AI adoption in the Philippines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.430405
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can AI Replace Teachers? The Value of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Education

Apolinar Fudalan
1 citations
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Can AI Replace Teachers? The Value of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Education

Apolinar Fudalan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly embedded in global education systems, their impact on teaching practices, teacher roles, and student learning requires critical exploration. In the Philippine context, where values formation and relational pedagogy remain foundational, the question of whether AI can replace teachers has become both timely and necessary. This study employed a qualitative phenomenological research design to explore the lived experiences of 25 Filipino educators across public and private institutions in Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework, supported by NVivo software. The study focused on key areas including AI’s pedagogical value, its emotional limitations, ethical concerns, and institutional readiness. Four major themes emerged: (1) AI is viewed as an instructional support tool, not a replacement; (2) the human touch—empathy, mentorship, and moral guidance—remains irreplaceable; (3) significant gaps exist in digital readiness and teacher training; and (4) ethical apprehensions persist around data privacy, academic integrity, and teacher deskilling. Educators recognized AI’s usefulness in streamlining tasks and enhancing personalization, but emphasized that it must be implemented in ways that uphold teacher agency and professional identity. This study reinforces that AI, while beneficial for instructional support, cannot replicate the affective and ethical dimensions of human teaching. The Philippine education system must adopt a teacher-centric AI integration model that addresses infrastructure gaps, strengthens professional development, and embeds ethical safeguards. The findings contribute to emerging discourses on human-centered AI in education and offer timely policy and training insights for sustainable, inclusive, and culturally grounded AI adoption in the Philippines.

Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 43(4)
University of the Visayas (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.