The Problematic Nature of Presidential Defamation Provisions in a Democratic Rule-of-Law State

This study examines the application of defamation provisions against the President and Vice President in the Indonesian Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), particularly within the context of freedom of expression in a democratic state. The research aims to analyze the balance between the protection of public officials and the right to freedom of speech. Using a normative juridical method, this study analyzes legal norms and related defamation cases. The findings show that defamation against the President and Vice President is regulated under Articles 218(1), 218(2), 219, 240, and 241 of the National Criminal Code. Such acts are classified as attacks on dignity, encompassing not only insults but also slander, verbal abuse, and derogatory actions. The criminal elements include an attack on dignity, intent, and dissemination through information technology. These offenses are categorized as formal complaints and aduan offenses. However, the articles suffer from interpretive ambiguity and potentially restrict legitimate criticism, posing risks of power abuse and criminalizing free speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peradaban Hukum Nusantara
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62193/14c0fn50
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problematic Nature of Presidential Defamation Provisions in a Democratic Rule-of-Law State

Aria Wiratama Heriansyah
Peradaban Hukum Nusantara
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

The Problematic Nature of Presidential Defamation Provisions in a Democratic Rule-of-Law State

Aria Wiratama Heriansyah
article en

Abstract

This study examines the application of defamation provisions against the President and Vice President in the Indonesian Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), particularly within the context of freedom of expression in a democratic state. The research aims to analyze the balance between the protection of public officials and the right to freedom of speech. Using a normative juridical method, this study analyzes legal norms and related defamation cases. The findings show that defamation against the President and Vice President is regulated under Articles 218(1), 218(2), 219, 240, and 241 of the National Criminal Code. Such acts are classified as attacks on dignity, encompassing not only insults but also slander, verbal abuse, and derogatory actions. The criminal elements include an attack on dignity, intent, and dissemination through information technology. These offenses are categorized as formal complaints and aduan offenses. However, the articles suffer from interpretive ambiguity and potentially restrict legitimate criticism, posing risks of power abuse and criminalizing free speech.

Peradaban Hukum NusantaraVol. 2(1)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Problematic Nature of Presidential Defamation Provisions in a Democratic Rule-of-Law State — Aria Wiratama Heriansyah · Peradaban Hukum Nusantara (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS