Newton’s Second Law and Physics Textbooks

Abstract Contemporary textbooks of general physics teach us that the second law of Newton is F = ma . However, historical research has shown that Newton never wrote the equation, that Euler announced that he had discovered F = ma as a new principle of mechanics, and that Newton's second law and F = ma are different. This paper looks at the question from a different angle, namely how the principles have been applied to problem solving. To do this, we examine the problem-solving strategies used in the eighteenth century, in the following two centuries, and in textbooks today. We find that eighteenth century authors, namely those who followed Newton, did not use F = ma . In the nineteenth century, the equation became important in the practice of mechanics, as well as for conceptual purposes, physicists were concerned with the concept of force. These physicists did not identify the equation with Newton's second law. By comparing the problem-solving strategies of the eighteenth century and today, we can clarify the concept of force and understand why solving the conceptual problem of force has been difficult.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations of Science
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-025-09990-3
Primary Topic
History and Theory of Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Newton’s Second Law and Physics Textbooks

Ricardo Lopes Coelho
Foundations of Science
History and Theory of Mathematics
article

Newton’s Second Law and Physics Textbooks

Ricardo Lopes Coelho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary textbooks of general physics teach us that the second law of Newton is F = ma . However, historical research has shown that Newton never wrote the equation, that Euler announced that he had discovered F = ma as a new principle of mechanics, and that Newton's second law and F = ma are different. This paper looks at the question from a different angle, namely how the principles have been applied to problem solving. To do this, we examine the problem-solving strategies used in the eighteenth century, in the following two centuries, and in textbooks today. We find that eighteenth century authors, namely those who followed Newton, did not use F = ma . In the nineteenth century, the equation became important in the practice of mechanics, as well as for conceptual purposes, physicists were concerned with the concept of force. These physicists did not identify the equation with Newton's second law. By comparing the problem-solving strategies of the eighteenth century and today, we can clarify the concept of force and understand why solving the conceptual problem of force has been difficult.

Foundations of ScienceVol. 31(1)
University of Lisbon (PT)
Universidade de Lisboa
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
History and Theory of Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.