Spent Coffee Grains (SCG) to biofuels: a comparative techno-economic evaluation for hydrogen and methane production

Environmental concerns regarding greenhouse gases have spurred research into alternative energy sources. One of the most prevalent waste products in the beverage industry is spent coffee grains (SCG), an estimated 60 million tons globally each year. These quantities justify the need to find effective ways to recycle this waste through the adoption of closed-loop circular economies (CE) and sustainable biofuel strategies. One promising approach is the conversion of SCG into biofuels, particularly biohydrogen and biomethane, through biological processes. However, prior to commercialization, it is critical to validate its potential profitability via technical and economic analyses, such as techno-economic assessment (TEA). To this end, in this study, the profitability of two scenarios for biohydrogen and biomethane production has been assessed to explore feasible processing routes for SCG valorization. First, a two-step dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion (DF-AD) process, and second, a two-step dark fermentation and photo fermentation (DF-PF) process. The profitability and sensitivity analysis results clarified that Scenario I should be chosen over Scenario II due to its higher net present value (NPV) of 138 million $, internal rate of return (IRR) of 15.3 %, gross margin (GM) of 56.9 %, return on investment (ROI) of 12.7 % and shorter payback period (PBP) of 6.2 years. • The techno-economic evaluation of SCG processing scenarios was performed. • The two-step dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion process was more profitable. • Plant location effect was evaluated considering rural part of Europe and Norway. • The payback period of the scenarios was varied from 6.2 to 8.1 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108220
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spent Coffee Grains (SCG) to biofuels: a comparative techno-economic evaluation for hydrogen and methane production

Georgeio Semaan, Gopalakrishnan Kumar, Abdullah Bilal Öztürk, Natalija Jakovljevic
2 citations
Biomass and Bioenergy
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.01
article

Spent Coffee Grains (SCG) to biofuels: a comparative techno-economic evaluation for hydrogen and methane production

Georgeio Semaan, Gopalakrishnan Kumar, Abdullah Bilal Öztürk, Natalija Jakovljevic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Environmental concerns regarding greenhouse gases have spurred research into alternative energy sources. One of the most prevalent waste products in the beverage industry is spent coffee grains (SCG), an estimated 60 million tons globally each year. These quantities justify the need to find effective ways to recycle this waste through the adoption of closed-loop circular economies (CE) and sustainable biofuel strategies. One promising approach is the conversion of SCG into biofuels, particularly biohydrogen and biomethane, through biological processes. However, prior to commercialization, it is critical to validate its potential profitability via technical and economic analyses, such as techno-economic assessment (TEA). To this end, in this study, the profitability of two scenarios for biohydrogen and biomethane production has been assessed to explore feasible processing routes for SCG valorization. First, a two-step dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion (DF-AD) process, and second, a two-step dark fermentation and photo fermentation (DF-PF) process. The profitability and sensitivity analysis results clarified that Scenario I should be chosen over Scenario II due to its higher net present value (NPV) of 138 million $, internal rate of return (IRR) of 15.3 %, gross margin (GM) of 56.9 %, return on investment (ROI) of 12.7 % and shorter payback period (PBP) of 6.2 years. • The techno-economic evaluation of SCG processing scenarios was performed. • The two-step dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion process was more profitable. • Plant location effect was evaluated considering rural part of Europe and Norway. • The payback period of the scenarios was varied from 6.2 to 8.1 years.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 202
Yıldız Technical University (TR), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.