Exploring mathematics teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking

This study aims to explore teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking and strategies to develop students’ algorithmic thinking skills. This study is a qualitative research using a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through a questionnaire and an interview. In the data analysis process, we used the first cycle and second cycle coding techniques with NVivo. The findings show that both teachers and lecturers perceive algorithmic thinking as the ability to think of procedures for solving problems algorithmically, logically, and systematically. Participants shared the same perception that algorithmic thinking helps students engage in solving mathematics-related problems in context-oriented and problem-based learning activities. Several efforts offered by participants to improve algorithmic thinking skills include optimizing problem-solving and contextual learning activities, and creating concept maps in teaching and learning activities. Participants also believed that algorithmic thinking encompasses cognitive thinking abilities, such as abstraction and decomposition, in addition to its advantages and applications. The theoretical contributions of the research include the concept of algorithmic thinking, its advantages and implications for daily activities and solving mathematical problems, and efforts to enhance algorithmic thinking abilities. In the future, there is an opportunity to conduct research related to exploring the aspects of algorithmic thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i5.8817
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring mathematics teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking

Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono, Agung Lukito, Ariesta Kartika Sari
1 links
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Exploring mathematics teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking

Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono, Agung Lukito, Ariesta Kartika Sari
article en

Abstract

This study aims to explore teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking and strategies to develop students’ algorithmic thinking skills. This study is a qualitative research using a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through a questionnaire and an interview. In the data analysis process, we used the first cycle and second cycle coding techniques with NVivo. The findings show that both teachers and lecturers perceive algorithmic thinking as the ability to think of procedures for solving problems algorithmically, logically, and systematically. Participants shared the same perception that algorithmic thinking helps students engage in solving mathematics-related problems in context-oriented and problem-based learning activities. Several efforts offered by participants to improve algorithmic thinking skills include optimizing problem-solving and contextual learning activities, and creating concept maps in teaching and learning activities. Participants also believed that algorithmic thinking encompasses cognitive thinking abilities, such as abstraction and decomposition, in addition to its advantages and applications. The theoretical contributions of the research include the concept of algorithmic thinking, its advantages and implications for daily activities and solving mathematical problems, and efforts to enhance algorithmic thinking abilities. In the future, there is an opportunity to conduct research related to exploring the aspects of algorithmic thinking.

International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific StudiesVol. 8(5)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.