Combination of Internal Variability and Forced Response Reconciles Observed 2023–2024 Warming

Abstract The record‐breaking global mean surface temperature (GMST) in 2023 and 2024 came as a surprise to the scientific community, raising the question whether it provides evidence for a recent abrupt increase in the forced global warming rate. Here, we provide a new statistical learning‐based method to quantify the forced and internal variability contributions to annual GMST based on CMIP6‐simulated surface temperatures, producing a variability‐adjusted GMST time series. We find a variability contribution to 2023 GMST of 0.1 K, with strong contributions from the El Niño Southern Oscillation region and North Atlantic. More than half of the 2022–2023 jump in temperature is explained by variability, largely owing to anomalously cool conditions in 2022. We find insufficient evidence of an abrupt increase in forced warming rate in recent years. Our results highlight the importance of variability originating outside the tropical Pacific and the need to filter out unforced variability when assessing changes in long‐term warming rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115270
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combination of Internal Variability and Forced Response Reconciles Observed 2023–2024 Warming

Sebastian Sippel, Reto Knutti, Gergana Gyuleva
5 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
5.53
article

Combination of Internal Variability and Forced Response Reconciles Observed 2023–2024 Warming

Sebastian Sippel, Reto Knutti, Gergana Gyuleva
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The record‐breaking global mean surface temperature (GMST) in 2023 and 2024 came as a surprise to the scientific community, raising the question whether it provides evidence for a recent abrupt increase in the forced global warming rate. Here, we provide a new statistical learning‐based method to quantify the forced and internal variability contributions to annual GMST based on CMIP6‐simulated surface temperatures, producing a variability‐adjusted GMST time series. We find a variability contribution to 2023 GMST of 0.1 K, with strong contributions from the El Niño Southern Oscillation region and North Atlantic. More than half of the 2022–2023 jump in temperature is explained by variability, largely owing to anomalously cool conditions in 2022. We find insufficient evidence of an abrupt increase in forced warming rate in recent years. Our results highlight the importance of variability originating outside the tropical Pacific and the need to filter out unforced variability when assessing changes in long‐term warming rates.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(14)
ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate variability and models
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.