Executive discretion in sports awards: a case study of Pakistan’s Olympians

This study examines the recent executive decision to award tax-free prizes to athletes in Pakistan, specifically analyzing the case of Arshad Nadeem’s Olympic gold medal award. It explores the tension between executive discretion and the principle of equality before the law within Pakistan’s legal framework. The research aims to assess the alignment of this decision with existing tax regulations and constitutional principles. Using a qualitative approach combining case study, doctrinal legal research and document analysis, the study evaluates relevant laws, policies and international practices. Findings indicate that the tax exemption decision lacks consistency with existing legal frameworks and may set problematic precedents. Recommendations include amending sports board constitutions, implementing a structured reward system, and establishing a dedicated Sports Excellence Fund. The study concludes that while celebrating athletic achievements is important, it should occur within a framework that upholds principles of equality, transparency and the rule of law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2534414
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Executive discretion in sports awards: a case study of Pakistan’s Olympians

Naeem AllahRakha
Cogent Social Sciences
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Executive discretion in sports awards: a case study of Pakistan’s Olympians

Naeem AllahRakha
article en

Abstract

This study examines the recent executive decision to award tax-free prizes to athletes in Pakistan, specifically analyzing the case of Arshad Nadeem’s Olympic gold medal award. It explores the tension between executive discretion and the principle of equality before the law within Pakistan’s legal framework. The research aims to assess the alignment of this decision with existing tax regulations and constitutional principles. Using a qualitative approach combining case study, doctrinal legal research and document analysis, the study evaluates relevant laws, policies and international practices. Findings indicate that the tax exemption decision lacks consistency with existing legal frameworks and may set problematic precedents. Recommendations include amending sports board constitutions, implementing a structured reward system, and establishing a dedicated Sports Excellence Fund. The study concludes that while celebrating athletic achievements is important, it should occur within a framework that upholds principles of equality, transparency and the rule of law.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.