Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics

Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling. • Integrates UDEs with ML to recover constitutive equations for viscoelastic fluids. • Shows UDEs can extrapolate stress beyond training for UCM, JS and Giesekus models. • Shows limits in learning the Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner model due to complex terms. • Distillation simplifies complex viscoelastic models while preserving key behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111788
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics

Roney L. Thompson, Dário Augusto Borges Oliveira, Roberto F. Ausas, Elias C. Rodrigues
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics

Roney L. Thompson, Dário Augusto Borges Oliveira, Roberto F. Ausas, Elias C. Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling. • Integrates UDEs with ML to recover constitutive equations for viscoelastic fluids. • Shows UDEs can extrapolate stress beyond training for UCM, JS and Giesekus models. • Shows limits in learning the Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner model due to complex terms. • Distillation simplifies complex viscoelastic models while preserving key behaviors.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 160
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.