Addressing spatial confounding in geostatistical regression models: An R‐ <scp>INLA</scp> approach

Abstract Spatial confounding, which has been studied extensively in recent years, can explain inconsistencies between results obtained by regression models with and without spatial modelling. While the most common solutions for spatial confounding mitigation often target areal data or geostatistical data modelling by splines, we aim to extend some resolution methods for geostatistical data modelling by Gaussian Markov Random Fields (GMRF) using R‐INLA methodology, aided by the R‐inlabru package. We focus on four sought‐after approaches for alleviating spatial confounding: Restricted spatial regression (RSR), geoadditive structural equation model (gSEM), Spatial+, and its simplified version, called here Spatial+2.0. We show how each can be implemented from geostatistical data in a GMRF framework using R‐inlabru. Next, a simulation study that produces a spatial confounding phenomenon in a geostatistical context is carried out to assess the coherence of the proposed extensions with the expectations of these methods. Then we apply the expanded approaches to a case study, linking cadmium (Cd) concentration in terrestrial mosses to Cd concentration in air. Our findings support the feasibility of our extended approach of spatial confounding resolution methods to geostatistical data using R‐inlabru in keeping with the previous contexts, although certain precautions and limitations must be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70106
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing spatial confounding in geostatistical regression models: An R‐ INLA approach

Julien Lamouroux, Sébastien Leblond, Caroline Meyer, Isabelle Albert et al.
3 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.40
article

Addressing spatial confounding in geostatistical regression models: An R‐ INLA approach

Julien Lamouroux, Sébastien Leblond, Caroline Meyer, Isabelle Albert, Alizée Geffroy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Spatial confounding, which has been studied extensively in recent years, can explain inconsistencies between results obtained by regression models with and without spatial modelling. While the most common solutions for spatial confounding mitigation often target areal data or geostatistical data modelling by splines, we aim to extend some resolution methods for geostatistical data modelling by Gaussian Markov Random Fields (GMRF) using R‐INLA methodology, aided by the R‐inlabru package. We focus on four sought‐after approaches for alleviating spatial confounding: Restricted spatial regression (RSR), geoadditive structural equation model (gSEM), Spatial+, and its simplified version, called here Spatial+2.0. We show how each can be implemented from geostatistical data in a GMRF framework using R‐inlabru. Next, a simulation study that produces a spatial confounding phenomenon in a geostatistical context is carried out to assess the coherence of the proposed extensions with the expectations of these methods. Then we apply the expanded approaches to a case study, linking cadmium (Cd) concentration in terrestrial mosses to Cd concentration in air. Our findings support the feasibility of our extended approach of spatial confounding resolution methods to geostatistical data using R‐inlabru in keeping with the previous contexts, although certain precautions and limitations must be considered.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(9)
AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.