Student-Initiated Interprofessional Case Discussions: Improving Students’ Perception of Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice / Studierenden-initiierte Interprofessionelle Fallbesprechungen: Verbesserung der studentischen Wahrnehmung

Abstract Introduction & Background Opportunities for interprofessional education (IPE) remain insufficient for healthcare students and young professionals. To address this, the Swiss Health Alliance for Interprofessional Education (SHAPED, www.shaped-ip.ch ) has developed a new IPE activity: the Interprofessional Case Discussions (ICDs). Led by a near-peer facilitator, students from different healthcare professions discuss a clinical case in a “murder-mystery” format: Can they catch the murderer (aka the disease) in time to save the patient? This study assessed the impact of the student-initiated ICDs on participants’ IPE perception. Methods Students from nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, midwifery, pharmacy, and medicine in interprofessional groups (6–8 students) participated in an ICD at Zurich University of Applied Sciences in spring 2024. The validated Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised (SPICE-R) self-report instrument was used in a pre-post-design. Results In total, 33 participants completed the pre- and post-questionnaire. The overall mean significantly improved from pre- ( M = 3.86, SD ± 0.39) to post-ICD (( M = 4.22, SD ± 0.42); paired t -test: t = −5.18, p < .001, n = 33). The calculated effect size ( d = 0.88) indicated a strong effect, according to Cohen (1992). After Bonferroni-adjustment for multiple testing, the two subscales teamwork and patient outcome showed statistically significant improvement pre- to post-ICD. Discussion Students showed high baseline scores, indicating a positive attitude toward IPE. However, participation in the ICDs further improved their perception of IPE, especially with regard to teamwork and patient outcome. While having limitations that come with a small sample-size, this study supports the efficacy of ICDs and reinforces the benefits of student-initiated IPE activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Professions
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2025-0006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student-Initiated Interprofessional Case Discussions: Improving Students’ Perception of Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice / Studierenden-initiierte Interprofessionelle Fallbesprechungen: Verbesserung der studentischen Wahrnehmung

Marion Huber, Lucas Büsser, Fanny Mulder, Corina Zweifel
1 citations
International Journal of Health Professions
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
article

Student-Initiated Interprofessional Case Discussions: Improving Students’ Perception of Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice / Studierenden-initiierte Interprofessionelle Fallbesprechungen: Verbesserung der studentischen Wahrnehmung

Marion Huber, Lucas Büsser, Fanny Mulder, Corina Zweifel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Background Opportunities for interprofessional education (IPE) remain insufficient for healthcare students and young professionals. To address this, the Swiss Health Alliance for Interprofessional Education (SHAPED, www.shaped-ip.ch ) has developed a new IPE activity: the Interprofessional Case Discussions (ICDs). Led by a near-peer facilitator, students from different healthcare professions discuss a clinical case in a “murder-mystery” format: Can they catch the murderer (aka the disease) in time to save the patient? This study assessed the impact of the student-initiated ICDs on participants’ IPE perception. Methods Students from nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, midwifery, pharmacy, and medicine in interprofessional groups (6–8 students) participated in an ICD at Zurich University of Applied Sciences in spring 2024. The validated Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education–Revised (SPICE-R) self-report instrument was used in a pre-post-design. Results In total, 33 participants completed the pre- and post-questionnaire. The overall mean significantly improved from pre- ( M = 3.86, SD ± 0.39) to post-ICD (( M = 4.22, SD ± 0.42); paired t -test: t = −5.18, p < .001, n = 33). The calculated effect size ( d = 0.88) indicated a strong effect, according to Cohen (1992). After Bonferroni-adjustment for multiple testing, the two subscales teamwork and patient outcome showed statistically significant improvement pre- to post-ICD. Discussion Students showed high baseline scores, indicating a positive attitude toward IPE. However, participation in the ICDs further improved their perception of IPE, especially with regard to teamwork and patient outcome. While having limitations that come with a small sample-size, this study supports the efficacy of ICDs and reinforces the benefits of student-initiated IPE activities.

International Journal of Health ProfessionsVol. 12(1)
University of Bern (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Society of Health and Physical Educators (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.