Artificial Intelligence in Mammography: A Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency

Breast cancer continues to be a considerable global health problem, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. Although mammography is widely considered the gold standard for screening, its interpretation is not straightforward and varies among readers. Our study aimed to compare the performance and computational efficiency of three leading Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures for classifying breast cancer automatically from mammogram images. We used a publicly available dataset consisting of 3,383 mammogram images, which were labeled as either Benign or Malignant, and we trained and evaluated three models: EfficientNetB7, EfficientNetv2-Small, and RexNet-200. We found the RexNet-200 architecture had the best performance across the performance metrics we measured, achieving the best accuracy (76.47%), precision (75.18%), and F1-score (77.44%). Even though EfficientNetB7 had a slightly better recall than the RexNet-200 model; the RexNet-200 model showed a more compelling accuracy-board balance in diagnosis. Furthermore, RexNet-200 had the best performance and lowest computational cost with a very low parameters count (13.81M) and lowest GFLOPS (3.0529) of the three models. Our study demonstrated that RexNet-200 had the best prospects for achieving the ideal balance of high diagnostic accuracy and economical use of resources. Therefore, RexNet-200 is a very promising candidate for incorporation into clinical decision support systems designed to assist radiologists in the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Systems and Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69882/adba.csai.2025075
Citations
8
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Mammography: A Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency

Nurettin Pacal, Luaay Alswilem
8 citations
Computational Systems and Artificial Intelligence
AI in cancer detection
19.85
article

Artificial Intelligence in Mammography: A Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency

Nurettin Pacal, Luaay Alswilem
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to be a considerable global health problem, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. Although mammography is widely considered the gold standard for screening, its interpretation is not straightforward and varies among readers. Our study aimed to compare the performance and computational efficiency of three leading Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures for classifying breast cancer automatically from mammogram images. We used a publicly available dataset consisting of 3,383 mammogram images, which were labeled as either Benign or Malignant, and we trained and evaluated three models: EfficientNetB7, EfficientNetv2-Small, and RexNet-200. We found the RexNet-200 architecture had the best performance across the performance metrics we measured, achieving the best accuracy (76.47%), precision (75.18%), and F1-score (77.44%). Even though EfficientNetB7 had a slightly better recall than the RexNet-200 model; the RexNet-200 model showed a more compelling accuracy-board balance in diagnosis. Furthermore, RexNet-200 had the best performance and lowest computational cost with a very low parameters count (13.81M) and lowest GFLOPS (3.0529) of the three models. Our study demonstrated that RexNet-200 had the best prospects for achieving the ideal balance of high diagnostic accuracy and economical use of resources. Therefore, RexNet-200 is a very promising candidate for incorporation into clinical decision support systems designed to assist radiologists in the early detection of breast cancer.

Computational Systems and Artificial IntelligenceVol. 1(1)
Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
AI in cancer detection
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.