Agricultural cooperatives boost food security through input subsidies in rural Zambia

• We examine how cooperatives and input subsidies jointly affect household food security. • Cooperative membership increases dietary diversity by 11.26% through input subsidies. • Cooperative membership increases food security by 20.39% through input subsidies. • Input subsidies are a key pathway to amplify the benefits of cooperative membership. • Stronger cooperative–subsidy integration can improve rural food security outcomes. While much has been learned on the impacts of cooperative membership and input subsidies in developing countries, the interplay between these two mechanisms in enhancing household food security remains unexplored. We address this gap by investigating the combined role of agricultural cooperatives and input subsidy programs at improving food security in Zambia—a context where cooperatives serve as key channels for delivering input subsidies to farmers. Using a random sample of 436 farmers from a Zambian typical rural area and instrumental variable-based causal mediation approach, we determine the impacts of cooperative membership on dietary diversity and food insecurity through input subsidy participation. The findings reveal that cooperative members benefit significantly from improved access to agricultural inputs, facilitated by input subsidies. Cooperative membership indirectly increases household dietary diversity by 11.26% and reduces food insecurity by 20.39%, demonstrating the critical role of social protection programs in amplifying the benefits of cooperatives. Although direct effects of cooperative membership also indicate improvements in dietary diversity and reductions in food insecurity, these effects are less pronounced without the mediating influence of input subsidies. The results demonstrate the necessity of aligning input subsidy programs with cooperative models to achieve meaningful food security outcomes. To maximize these benefits, the study recommends strengthening the integration of social protection programs with cooperatives, implementing targeted training for cooperative members, and promoting inclusive practices to ensure equitable access to program benefits. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance rural development and contribute to achieving global food security goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development Perspectives
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100710
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural cooperatives boost food security through input subsidies in rural Zambia

Stephen Prah, John N. Ng’ombe, Cornelius Zemba
2 citations
World Development Perspectives
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
article

Agricultural cooperatives boost food security through input subsidies in rural Zambia

Stephen Prah, John N. Ng’ombe, Cornelius Zemba
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• We examine how cooperatives and input subsidies jointly affect household food security. • Cooperative membership increases dietary diversity by 11.26% through input subsidies. • Cooperative membership increases food security by 20.39% through input subsidies. • Input subsidies are a key pathway to amplify the benefits of cooperative membership. • Stronger cooperative–subsidy integration can improve rural food security outcomes. While much has been learned on the impacts of cooperative membership and input subsidies in developing countries, the interplay between these two mechanisms in enhancing household food security remains unexplored. We address this gap by investigating the combined role of agricultural cooperatives and input subsidy programs at improving food security in Zambia—a context where cooperatives serve as key channels for delivering input subsidies to farmers. Using a random sample of 436 farmers from a Zambian typical rural area and instrumental variable-based causal mediation approach, we determine the impacts of cooperative membership on dietary diversity and food insecurity through input subsidy participation. The findings reveal that cooperative members benefit significantly from improved access to agricultural inputs, facilitated by input subsidies. Cooperative membership indirectly increases household dietary diversity by 11.26% and reduces food insecurity by 20.39%, demonstrating the critical role of social protection programs in amplifying the benefits of cooperatives. Although direct effects of cooperative membership also indicate improvements in dietary diversity and reductions in food insecurity, these effects are less pronounced without the mediating influence of input subsidies. The results demonstrate the necessity of aligning input subsidy programs with cooperative models to achieve meaningful food security outcomes. To maximize these benefits, the study recommends strengthening the integration of social protection programs with cooperatives, implementing targeted training for cooperative members, and promoting inclusive practices to ensure equitable access to program benefits. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance rural development and contribute to achieving global food security goals.

World Development PerspectivesVol. 39
University of Zambia (ZM), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.