“Our fish are not your marine biodiversity”: tensions in integrating fisheries into the BBNJ Agreement

Abstract The 2023 Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement aims to conserve and sustainably use marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. However, separating fisheries from broader conservation frameworks has led to fragmented governance. This paper examines how spatial, technological, institutional, and philosophical tensions complicated efforts to integrate fisheries within the BBNJ framework. A qualitative methodology was used to analyse general perceptions of fisheries within marine biodiversity in the context of BBNJ Agreement and negotiations. Statements and interviews with stakeholders, including delegates, fisheries managers, and conservationists, were conducted during and after the BBNJ negotiations. Survey results revealed divergent perspectives on the relationship between fisheries management and marine biodiversity conservation, highlighting the persistent tensions between conservation and sustainable use objectives. These divides must be bridged to support more coherent, inclusive, and effective ocean governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Ocean Sustainability
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00142-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Our fish are not your marine biodiversity”: tensions in integrating fisheries into the BBNJ Agreement

Eylem Elma, Katherine G. Sammler, Solomon Sebuliba
1 citations
npj Ocean Sustainability
International Maritime Law Issues
2.42
article

“Our fish are not your marine biodiversity”: tensions in integrating fisheries into the BBNJ Agreement

Eylem Elma, Katherine G. Sammler, Solomon Sebuliba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 2023 Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement aims to conserve and sustainably use marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. However, separating fisheries from broader conservation frameworks has led to fragmented governance. This paper examines how spatial, technological, institutional, and philosophical tensions complicated efforts to integrate fisheries within the BBNJ framework. A qualitative methodology was used to analyse general perceptions of fisheries within marine biodiversity in the context of BBNJ Agreement and negotiations. Statements and interviews with stakeholders, including delegates, fisheries managers, and conservationists, were conducted during and after the BBNJ negotiations. Survey results revealed divergent perspectives on the relationship between fisheries management and marine biodiversity conservation, highlighting the persistent tensions between conservation and sustainable use objectives. These divides must be bridged to support more coherent, inclusive, and effective ocean governance.

npj Ocean SustainabilityVol. 4(1)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity (DE)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
International Maritime Law Issues
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.