Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts

The choice of oral anticoagulants and oral corticosteroid (OCS) burst cotherapy may influence the risk of major bleeding; however, this risk remains poorly characterized. We aimed to quantify the comparative safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin on major bleeding while receiving OCS burst cotherapy among patients with atrial fibrillation. A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. We examined associations between NOACs (edoxaban, apixaban, dabigartran, or rivaroxaban) or warfarin with OCS burst cotherapy and major bleeding. We measured the risk by estimating incidence, incidence risk ratios (IRRs), and adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) after adjusting for baseline differences using overlap weighting. In this study, among 239,693 patients receiving oral anticoagulants, 50,390 (21%) received at least one OCS burst, defined as OCS use for less than 30 days, were included. A lower risk of major bleeding related to OCS burst cotherapy with NOACs versus warfarin was noted (AHR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.52-0.61]). The greatest incidence was observed in patients with warfarin and OCS burst cotherapy (67.30 per 1000 person-years). The incidence for patients prescribing OCS burst cotherapy with edoxaban (30.36 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.45 [95% CI = 0.38-0.53]), apixaban (34.93 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.45-0.60]), dabigatran (42.47 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.56-0.72]), and rivaroxaban (46.99 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.63-0.77]), separately, was lower than that with warfarin. The results reveal that the incidence of major bleeding was lowest for edoxaban and highest for warfarin, with notable differences in incidence rates across NOACs among patients receiving oral anticoagulants and OCS burst cotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70311
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts

Sheng‐Mao Chang, Hui‐Ju Tsai, Yi‐Fen Tsai, Tsung‐Chieh Yao et al.
Clinical and Translational Science
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts

Sheng‐Mao Chang, Hui‐Ju Tsai, Yi‐Fen Tsai, Tsung‐Chieh Yao, Shuo‐Ju Chiang
article en

Abstract

The choice of oral anticoagulants and oral corticosteroid (OCS) burst cotherapy may influence the risk of major bleeding; however, this risk remains poorly characterized. We aimed to quantify the comparative safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin on major bleeding while receiving OCS burst cotherapy among patients with atrial fibrillation. A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. We examined associations between NOACs (edoxaban, apixaban, dabigartran, or rivaroxaban) or warfarin with OCS burst cotherapy and major bleeding. We measured the risk by estimating incidence, incidence risk ratios (IRRs), and adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) after adjusting for baseline differences using overlap weighting. In this study, among 239,693 patients receiving oral anticoagulants, 50,390 (21%) received at least one OCS burst, defined as OCS use for less than 30 days, were included. A lower risk of major bleeding related to OCS burst cotherapy with NOACs versus warfarin was noted (AHR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.52-0.61]). The greatest incidence was observed in patients with warfarin and OCS burst cotherapy (67.30 per 1000 person-years). The incidence for patients prescribing OCS burst cotherapy with edoxaban (30.36 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.45 [95% CI = 0.38-0.53]), apixaban (34.93 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.45-0.60]), dabigatran (42.47 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.56-0.72]), and rivaroxaban (46.99 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.63-0.77]), separately, was lower than that with warfarin. The results reveal that the incidence of major bleeding was lowest for edoxaban and highest for warfarin, with notable differences in incidence rates across NOACs among patients receiving oral anticoagulants and OCS burst cotherapy.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 18(8)
National Health Research Institutes (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW), Taoyuan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei City Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW), National Taipei University (TW)
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, National Health Research Institutes, National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.