Distinguishing environmental controls on strong vs. extreme wind gusts
Statistical and theoretical models of wind gusts may be dominated by more common strong events, rather than rare but damaging extreme ones. We address this by combining case studies of six extreme gust cases in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, with statistical and machine-learning (random forest) models to identify environmental factors distinguishing “strong” ( ≥ 18 m/s ) vs. “extreme” ( ≥ 25 m/s ) gust events in a 20-year dataset. The BARRA-SY high-resolution regional reanalysis is used to augment in-situ observations and provide a model gust speed diagnostic for evaluation, as well as environmental prediction metrics. All the extreme wind cases were linked to deep convection, often organized into linear systems. A random forest model achieved 89% accuracy for predicting strong winds generally, with the gust diagnostic and environmental background wind speeds as the top predictors. For distinguishing extreme from strong gusts, the model’s accuracy was 79%, but with a high false alarm rate. Both statistical and machine-learning analyses highlight convective instability metrics — Most Unstable Convective Available Potential Energy (MUCAPE), Derecho Composite Parameter (DCP), and k_index - as key predictors of extreme gusts. The BARRA-SY gust speed diagnostic thus informs about strong wind gusts, but not extremes, which depend on variables it ignores. Instability measures, however, are also imperfect predictors of extreme gusts because they fail to capture storm trigger conditions, seen in some of the case studies. These findings demonstrate that the factors driving extreme wind gusts differ substantially from those driving strong but less extreme gusts. Therefore, statistical analyses or predictive models that consider all strong gusts collectively will likely fail to uncover the environmental factors responsible for the most extreme events with greatest impact. • Analyzed six extreme gust cases in detail and studied 20 years of data statistically. • All six extreme wind gust cases were associated with severe convective cells. • Instability metrics better distinguish extreme vs. strong gusts than wind speed or humidity. • Parameterized gust speed informs about strong winds but not extremes. • Results highlight the role of storm triggers, which were overlooked in past gust studies.
Authors
- Fei Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-1558)
- Moutassem El Rafei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4358-1418)
- Andrew Dowdy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-4471)
- Steven C. Sherwood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-8216)
- Andrew Brown (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-295X)
- Jason P. Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-3429)
- Greeshma Surendran
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Sydney Water (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Collaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research (AU)
- Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (AU)
- Department for Environment and Water (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Weather and Climate Extremes
- Published
- 2025-07-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100788
- Primary Topic
- Wind and Air Flow Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Australian Research Council