Distinguishing environmental controls on strong vs. extreme wind gusts

Statistical and theoretical models of wind gusts may be dominated by more common strong events, rather than rare but damaging extreme ones. We address this by combining case studies of six extreme gust cases in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, with statistical and machine-learning (random forest) models to identify environmental factors distinguishing “strong” ( ≥ 18 m/s ) vs. “extreme” ( ≥ 25 m/s ) gust events in a 20-year dataset. The BARRA-SY high-resolution regional reanalysis is used to augment in-situ observations and provide a model gust speed diagnostic for evaluation, as well as environmental prediction metrics. All the extreme wind cases were linked to deep convection, often organized into linear systems. A random forest model achieved 89% accuracy for predicting strong winds generally, with the gust diagnostic and environmental background wind speeds as the top predictors. For distinguishing extreme from strong gusts, the model’s accuracy was 79%, but with a high false alarm rate. Both statistical and machine-learning analyses highlight convective instability metrics — Most Unstable Convective Available Potential Energy (MUCAPE), Derecho Composite Parameter (DCP), and k_index - as key predictors of extreme gusts. The BARRA-SY gust speed diagnostic thus informs about strong wind gusts, but not extremes, which depend on variables it ignores. Instability measures, however, are also imperfect predictors of extreme gusts because they fail to capture storm trigger conditions, seen in some of the case studies. These findings demonstrate that the factors driving extreme wind gusts differ substantially from those driving strong but less extreme gusts. Therefore, statistical analyses or predictive models that consider all strong gusts collectively will likely fail to uncover the environmental factors responsible for the most extreme events with greatest impact. • Analyzed six extreme gust cases in detail and studied 20 years of data statistically. • All six extreme wind gust cases were associated with severe convective cells. • Instability metrics better distinguish extreme vs. strong gusts than wind speed or humidity. • Parameterized gust speed informs about strong winds but not extremes. • Results highlight the role of storm triggers, which were overlooked in past gust studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Climate Extremes
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100788
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing environmental controls on strong vs. extreme wind gusts

Fei Ji, Moutassem El Rafei, Andrew Dowdy, Steven C. Sherwood et al.
Weather and Climate Extremes
Wind and Air Flow Studies
article

Distinguishing environmental controls on strong vs. extreme wind gusts

Fei Ji, Moutassem El Rafei, Andrew Dowdy, Steven C. Sherwood, Andrew Brown, Jason P. Evans, Greeshma Surendran
article en

Abstract

Statistical and theoretical models of wind gusts may be dominated by more common strong events, rather than rare but damaging extreme ones. We address this by combining case studies of six extreme gust cases in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, with statistical and machine-learning (random forest) models to identify environmental factors distinguishing “strong” ( ≥ 18 m/s ) vs. “extreme” ( ≥ 25 m/s ) gust events in a 20-year dataset. The BARRA-SY high-resolution regional reanalysis is used to augment in-situ observations and provide a model gust speed diagnostic for evaluation, as well as environmental prediction metrics. All the extreme wind cases were linked to deep convection, often organized into linear systems. A random forest model achieved 89% accuracy for predicting strong winds generally, with the gust diagnostic and environmental background wind speeds as the top predictors. For distinguishing extreme from strong gusts, the model’s accuracy was 79%, but with a high false alarm rate. Both statistical and machine-learning analyses highlight convective instability metrics — Most Unstable Convective Available Potential Energy (MUCAPE), Derecho Composite Parameter (DCP), and k_index - as key predictors of extreme gusts. The BARRA-SY gust speed diagnostic thus informs about strong wind gusts, but not extremes, which depend on variables it ignores. Instability measures, however, are also imperfect predictors of extreme gusts because they fail to capture storm trigger conditions, seen in some of the case studies. These findings demonstrate that the factors driving extreme wind gusts differ substantially from those driving strong but less extreme gusts. Therefore, statistical analyses or predictive models that consider all strong gusts collectively will likely fail to uncover the environmental factors responsible for the most extreme events with greatest impact. • Analyzed six extreme gust cases in detail and studied 20 years of data statistically. • All six extreme wind gust cases were associated with severe convective cells. • Instability metrics better distinguish extreme vs. strong gusts than wind speed or humidity. • Parameterized gust speed informs about strong winds but not extremes. • Results highlight the role of storm triggers, which were overlooked in past gust studies.

Weather and Climate ExtremesVol. 49
The University of Melbourne (AU), Sydney Water (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Collaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research (AU), Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (AU), Department for Environment and Water (AU)
Australian Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.